You might be. The wheels and officer are clearly visible.

See above.

Are we watching the same videos?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp-video/mmvo255558725596

Yes. I maintain that it doesn't appear that her intent was to run over the officer, but that she would have had he not evaded - perhaps she expected him to evade. That doesn't matter.

We're doing slow motion frame by frame analysis of just how in danger an officer was, like;
https://x.com/CrimeWatchMpls/status/2009021559793402255

As I said, in civil society we shouldn't be at the line of contact where we need to split hairs and pore over fine details to see who was technically right or wrong, whether she was hitting him with the corner of the car, the mirror, or if he jumped away in time and she missed him by inches. In a world that wasn't already demented, we wouldn't need to reach the point of that kind of debate. ICE officers were in Minneapolis to enforce federal immigration law as per the laws we voted upon as a republic. Anti-ICE radicals have been stalking and harassing them, trying to obstruct and threaten them, showing up to raids for the express purpose of trying to interfere with operations. Would there be some organized group of pro-pedophile activists showing up to FBI raids on suspected pedophiles, trying to let the pedophiles get away? But we're in a powder keg because of one-sided radicalism.

And it also really doesn't matter whether the guy was clipped or right in her path or if she was turning just enough to avoid him. She woke up that morning and decided to go to an ICE protest to obstruct officers, she chose to get in a vehicle and block them, she ignored instructions when approached by officers and tried to zoom away, crime after crime, and the result of her crimes was she clearly accelerated towards an officer who had obvious reason to believe his life was in immediate danger. When someone is in front of your vehicle and you floor it, they have every reason to think they're going to die and its at a minimum assault with a deadly weapon.

I think those would all be great points if she wasn't dead.

She did a bunch of shitty and illegal things that she should have been charged for. Killing her was wild and unjustified.

It's not splitting hairs to say he wasn't in danger and shouldn't have shot her, it's literally the difference between life and death.

More information revealing that the deceased is a 37 year old lesbian woman.

Yet more LGBT initiated violence.

Defensive gun use isn't about what should happen. The officer had a very obvious and clear reason to believe he was in imminent danger. Her actions were wild and unjustified, his were not. She was clearly accelerating towards him as she started moving, its splitting hairs to look at the exact relative angle of her tires or how much of her turn was conscious vs being slumped dead at the wheel, or how much of her vehicle made contact with him because of his well timed dark souls sidestep. He had to make a split second decision and he made it as a woman had her vehicle lined up at him and gunned it. She pointed a deadly weapon at him and pulled the trigger on it. The rest doesn't really matter

lets just say it and get it over with.
the left leap with joy over ashly babbitt
and roll around on the ground in grief and abject horror for the car woman

https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/2008976092326203562

More of that excessive slow motion analysis here
At the moment the woman starts accelerating forwards, the officer is lined up in front of the vehicle, in front of the driver's side, if you drew a straight line from back seat drivers side to driver's seat to the officer. She hasn't finished turning her wheels out of the reversed turn and has them straight forwards as she hits the gas, with her initial part of the turn sliding a bit on the ice with tires slipping and has only started the turn to the right in earnest at the moment she's shot

Now why is a 37 year old lesbian in a situation where she's trying to speed away from/thru officers who are at her window and in front of her vehicle, a situation in which trying to flee let alone run someone down is very obviously a criminal action.
Because she created these circumstances and was the aggressor