d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The U.s. Foreign Policy - Interests, Not Allies
Prev14567814Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 23,970
Joined: Feb 28 2007
Gold: 35,554.14
Warn: 10%
Jan 7 2026 10:16am
It seems like everyone is a Mossad agent but Netanyahu. But that's not certain.


I highly doubt that.
But I can 100% show you Trumps connections to Roy Cohen since the 70's.
Member
Posts: 9,097
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Jan 7 2026 10:38am
Using your analogy, Team Europe paid for an external contractor to step in during WWII and has spent the next 80 years paying off that initial job. The contractor found inventive ways (the Marshall Plan) to keep getting paid. England for example, paid off the US for entering WW2 in 2006. This isn’t an alliance. These aren’t allies. It’s transactional payment for services. The contractor never truly joined the team — he was always looking out for himself.

Blaming other nations for America’s non-prioritization of its own infrastructure and domestic systems — say, health care — is misplaced. That’s an internal issue, not an external one, and only relevant as a footnote: the U.S. is built on a culture of rugged individualism, where people, and by extension the nation, look out for themselves first, and help for others is conditional at best. American Culture.

An old man quietly plants acorns in a barren valley, knowing he will never live to enjoy the shade - but his grandchildren will. It’s a story about patience, legacy, and doing good without expecting payment. It’s not an American story, its a French story (granted I can also argue about France all day long!).


United States changing posture to now prioritize its own domestic issues is not blaming other nations, it's simply re tacking the sheets for optimal steerage. It's the end of a long illogical sunk cost calculus in US foreign policy.
Member
Posts: 92,890
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jan 7 2026 11:14am
Using your analogy, Team Europe paid for an external contractor to step in during WWII and has spent the next 80 years paying off that initial job. The contractor found inventive ways (the Marshall Plan) to keep getting paid. England for example, paid off the US for entering WW2 in 2006. This isn’t an alliance. These aren’t allies. It’s transactional payment for services. The contractor never truly joined the team — he was always looking out for himself.

Blaming other nations for America’s non-prioritization of its own infrastructure and domestic systems — say, health care — is misplaced. That’s an internal issue, not an external one, and only relevant as a footnote: the U.S. is built on a culture of rugged individualism, where people, and by extension the nation, look out for themselves first, and help for others is conditional at best. American Culture.

An old man quietly plants acorns in a barren valley, knowing he will never live to enjoy the shade - but his grandchildren will. It’s a story about patience, legacy, and doing good without expecting payment. It’s not an American story, its a French story (granted I can also argue about France all day long!).


I think this sentence hits on a really poignant note. the US is built on rugged individualism, and by proxy can only work if the nation is built on pure self interest as well. a nation where each person looks out for what's best for them can't coherently operate in a world of globalism because globalism is never the best thing for individuals in the upper echelon of the world's living standards.

by extension this means that one or the other has to change, the US citizens needs to be more collectivist or the US foreign and domestic policy needs to be more self serving. one is far easier than the other, and it's certainly not changing the hearts and minds of 400 million people.

still dont think we militarily take greenland, even with that in mind. although id be happy if NATO was dissolved in place of a more lax alliance treaty with guarantees to supply military purchases to European nations.
Member
Posts: 56,243
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Jan 7 2026 11:18am
United States changing posture to now prioritize its own domestic issues is not blaming other nations, it's simply re tacking the sheets for optimal steerage. It's the end of a long illogical sunk cost calculus in US foreign policy.


We’re not talking about U.S. domestic posture, we’re talking about foreign policy. Those are very different.

You suggest the U.S. is changing its posture to now prioritize its own domestic issues. I’d argue U.S. foreign policy is being used to deflect away from domestic issues, masking real problems. I am not talking about Epstein and what not. Infrastructure is decaying, gun violence is rampant, high-speed rail is non-existent, housing is unaffordable, health care remains for-profit. Going abroad doesn’t fix these issues, it hides them. Sure war can unite a divided country, but do you really think that is going to happen here? Which domestic issues are you talking about?

I think this sentence hits on a really poignant note. the US is built on rugged individualism, and by proxy can only work if the nation is built on pure self interest as well. a nation where each person looks out for what's best for them can't coherently operate in a world of globalism because globalism is never the best thing for individuals in the upper echelon of the world's living standards.

by extension this means that one or the other has to change, the US citizens needs to be more collectivist or the US foreign and domestic policy needs to be more self serving. one is far easier than the other, and it's certainly not changing the hearts and minds of 400 million people.

still dont think we militarily take greenland, even with that in mind. although id be happy if NATO was dissolved in place of a more lax alliance treaty with guarantees to supply military purchases to European nations.


From what I have read, the U.S. has repeatedly (over the years) tried to BUY Greenland. This is not a fad or a momentary thing. This is not the brainchild of Donald Trump. It pre-dates him. What we are seeing here is U.S. foreign policy which exists regardless of who is president. And yes, it remains to be seen what happens. However, from a logic standpoint based on what we have seen over the last few years, based on all the numbers and points (which i can regurgitate) this to my mind is the most logical outcome (leave morality and right & wrong at the door and look at U.S. foreign policy and how it acts).

The Irish leader was interviewed today and he said its not realistic for the U.S. to buy Greenland. This was repeated throughout europe. This notion that a country is not for sale is truly laughable on the part of the EU - by even entertaining this question they are inviting the U.S. to take action (in my opinion).

This post was edited by ferdia on Jan 7 2026 11:31am
Member
Posts: 92,890
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jan 7 2026 11:57am
We’re not talking about U.S. domestic posture, we’re talking about foreign policy. Those are very different.

You suggest the U.S. is changing its posture to now prioritize its own domestic issues. I’d argue U.S. foreign policy is being used to deflect away from domestic issues, masking real problems. I am not talking about Epstein and what not. Infrastructure is decaying, gun violence is rampant, high-speed rail is non-existent, housing is unaffordable, health care remains for-profit. Going abroad doesn’t fix these issues, it hides them. Sure war can unite a divided country, but do you really think that is going to happen here? Which domestic issues are you talking about?



From what I have read, the U.S. has repeatedly (over the years) tried to BUY Greenland. This is not a fad or a momentary thing. This is not the brainchild of Donald Trump. It pre-dates him. What we are seeing here is U.S. foreign policy which exists regardless of who is president. And yes, it remains to be seen what happens. However, from a logic standpoint based on what we have seen over the last few years, based on all the numbers and points (which i can regurgitate) this to my mind is the most logical outcome (leave morality and right & wrong at the door and look at U.S. foreign policy and how it acts).

The Irish leader was interviewed today and he said its not realistic for the U.S. to buy Greenland. This was repeated throughout europe. This notion that a country is not for sale is truly laughable on the part of the EU - by even entertaining this question they are inviting the U.S. to take action (in my opinion).


while is laughable to suggest you can't buy a country, it may be terrifying to see the cost laid out. i dont see any deal that works unless it's one that gives Denmark a stake in all mineral sales moving forward. there's no real way we can afford to buy Greenland outright unless we massively inflate our currency and just print it.
Member
Posts: 56,243
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Jan 7 2026 12:25pm
while is laughable to suggest you can't buy a country, it may be terrifying to see the cost laid out. i dont see any deal that works unless it's one that gives Denmark a stake in all mineral sales moving forward. there's no real way we can afford to buy Greenland outright unless we massively inflate our currency and just print it.


Ehhh im posting too much lets, ill let some other ppl post :)

This post was edited by ferdia on Jan 7 2026 12:26pm
Member
Posts: 12,289
Joined: Jul 22 2007
Gold: 84.67
Warn: 10%
Jan 7 2026 12:27pm
while is laughable to suggest you can't buy a country, it may be terrifying to see the cost laid out. i dont see any deal that works unless it's one that gives Denmark a stake in all mineral sales moving forward. there's no real way we can afford to buy Greenland outright unless we massively inflate our currency and just print it.


We're just outside the realm of doing that already. It took us 12 years after the fact to get rid of those god damn pennies.
Member
Posts: 16,000
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jan 7 2026 12:35pm
Technically we could but should we?

It would be another distant military outpost to perform experiments and extract oil from.
Member
Posts: 92,890
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jan 7 2026 12:37pm
We're just outside the realm of doing that already. It took us 12 years after the fact to get rid of those god damn pennies.


there's a BIG difference between printing money to be sent to US consumers (which i also dont support) and printing literal trillions just to offshore it to denmark. the biggest issue would be holders of US debt who would sell off immediately, something no one really did during covid checks to a significant degree.
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Jan 7 2026 02:14pm
For decades, the United States was widely described — especially in Europe — as the “world’s policeman”: a guarantor of order, an enforcer of shared rules, and the backbone of a rules-based international system. That idea left a deep psychological imprint on European governments and publics — one that is almost impossible to erase. Many assumed that American power would always act in the interest of Western alliances, guided by shared values, culture, and beliefs; that the West stood on the right side of history and had a duty to promote democracy and order globally.

In reality, the United States has long acted first and foremost in its own interests, not in the interests of allies. What is changing now is not U.S. behavior, but its candor. Statements by the American government — reflected in this discussion — highlight that this is a fundamental unmasking. We are not looking at one radical American leader. We are looking at an entire culture coming out and saying: might is right.

Europe misunderstood its relationship with the United States and is still clinging to the hope that this is just a bad dream. Washington may appear to be an ally — a disagreement, a debate, a relationship to maintain — but the American reality is different: Europe is not an ally in the U.S. calculus. It is a collection of interests that the United States supports only when convenient. Right now, European interests conflict with U.S. intent — and Greenland will be annexed (in my opinion).


Lol this is all hilarious. Europeans have done nothing but attack America and Americans for decades. Pull shady shit with the UN to vilify America like in Iraq. I've been saying it for years--if Europe wants to be treated like an ally they should start fucking acting like one.

You said that European newspapers decry anti-American sentiment. That's a great idea, but it hasn't worked at all. Almost every single European I've ever met has led with anti-American sentiment, and then when I counter them with the anti-European mindset talking points you may be familiar with, suddenly they're victims of hate speech.

An entire continent of ineffectual girls.

Yes, American policy has always been to support American interests first and foremost. Obviously. This is the duty of American leaders, as it is the duty of leaders of any nation. Luckily for you guys, American interests have been far-sighted enough that they take global stability and wellbeing into account. Defending your continent is not charity, it's calculated self-interest. You dickheads are not starting another world war ever again.

We want to help you. It's great for us. But you should encourage your fellow Europeans to understand that this is what is happening and has been happening for 80 years. You're not in charge any more, and the world(including you) has prospered to an unbelievable extent as a result of that control being wrestled from you. Stop acting like petulant children. Say thank you and start acting like a good ally and you will continue to be treated as one.

This post was edited by Shadowoffury on Jan 7 2026 02:20pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14567814Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll