you have no idea how hard you are proving my point right now. what do you think it means to "incorrectly add something completely retarded"? its just a room temperature way of stringing words that sound big together. add in a couple * and your word of the day and you get a winning argument :)
genuinely tree sounds like a phrase someone taught you that isnt real but they threw it in when you bought that bridge in Brooklyn
You aren't proving any point. You made a statement where the first half was accurate, that the rank of teams on that rank were generally good defenses minus the cowboys. Then you added that goofball take, as you normally do in your posts, about how its people looking for "Free money".
I then pointed out, that the image represents a mathematical projection of teams vs *AVERAGE* opponents on a neutral field, and not actually having anything to do with betting, or betting trends.
The obvious tangential argument here being your addition of the nonsense about people chasing free money, on a post not relating to, in any way, actual sports wagering.
But go on.