Wait, so you thought me correctly using tangential to point out your posting behavior was me being sesquipedalian?
Yikes man.
Listen, you *always* comment and say something genuinely tree, then incorrectly add something completely retarded, and I correct it, and then you go down the tangential path of arguing the retarded part of your argument, rather than merit of the part which was accurate. Its like, a classic Kimiko.
you have no idea how hard you are proving my point right now. what do you think it means to "incorrectly add something completely retarded"? its just a room temperature way of stringing words that sound big together. add in a couple * and your word of the day and you get a winning argument

genuinely tree sounds like a phrase someone taught you that isnt real but they threw it in when you bought that bridge in Brooklyn