Well obviously a massive cleanup effort would be needed. These sort of estimates “uninhabitable for 30-50 years” are and always have been purposely misleading nonsense. Vonnegut has a famous quote about rebuilding Dresden that is perhaps a bit exaggerated but not much. “The engineers said it would take 500 years, it actually took about eighteen weeks.”
As for whether this was a “good” disproportionate attack, that depends on what happens next. If Palestine stops attacking and supporting attacks against Israel, then yes, that’s a great result and will save lives in the long run. If not then they didn’t go far enough.
This metric is absurd. iran or others will find people who want to attack israel, and they'll sneak them rockets, and rockets will be fired. in reality the only way for this to come to fruition is to kill 90%+ of the population. everyone from iran, to qatar, to the usa, to even israel recognizes this. this is why so many israelis are literally genocidal, they'd happily wipe out 2 million people if it meant rockets wouldnt hit the iron dome any more.
Well to be fair here its not like they're living in the caucacus mountains, stocking sugarbeets and fish underground to last them the bitter winter winds
Until a few generations ago most of the arab tribesmen there had no permanent structures, and even today on the opposite coast of africa you have western saharan sahrawis living in tents.
They'll set up their own tents and get ample humanitarian aid trucked in, there's no reason to think the Palestinian population is even going to have a downturn
this isnt accurate, imo. israel left considerable infrastructure in gaza when it withdrew. and even if greenhouses or water lines were destroyed to make rockets they still had hospitals and buildings to live in. in america if you are forced to move from a shitty 1 bedroom appartment to a tent on the street thats considered a crisis.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Nov 7 2025 03:36pm