Simple data origins for that 4-6% would be sufficient. That's 5s of work if you had them.
If i had no proof i'd also post 3h long videos no working man could ever watch.

You basically provide a Mount Everest of trash and tell us to find a puzzle piece in it.

This post was edited by BaHgerAUT on Oct 15 2025 03:17am

the 4-6% screenshots are of Q posts, if you follow the correct people online u will almost get daily verification that the Q operation is real and happening in real time., i stated this several times now
I do plenty of research and post some of it here, but if your to busy or to lazy to do any research yourself , not a problem, move along

Trump , Scavino and FLynn posts tie directly to Q posts based on length of videos they post and timestamps pretty much daily, those following know this, those who dont do not. Now if you dont know about any of this thats not a problem, the problem is when people respond on topics they have done zero research on

This post was edited by darkhead69 on Oct 15 2025 03:20am

People can sum up a century of data gathered by 30 people in a 1000 word abstract.
You drown people in shit and if someone asks questions you tell them to dive in your shit. The first pile of shit is the verification for the 2nd pile of shit.

This post was edited by BaHgerAUT on Oct 15 2025 03:20am

well if u were following these sources i talk about and post about yourself you wouldnt have to look at my mounds of data, also nobody is forcing you to be on my thread. If my posts are to unorganized for your liking my appologies, im not a expert im just posting information that comes out.

This post was edited by darkhead69 on Oct 15 2025 03:23am

Mounds of shit*, not data. Data presentation is simple: you put your relevant findings into a few graphs and explain the methodology used. You also provide a folder with your raw data for peer review.
Even quantum physicists don’t need to drown their audience in a three-hour video, that’s only for people who want to influence their viewers’ opinions.

if you dont like how i post information in my thread you can go do your own research, make your own thread and present the information any way you like.
Yea im sure its easy to take all of this data we been obtaining over the past 5-10 years and put it into an organized and easy to read graph to appease you, sounds like thousands of hours of work, I'll pass on that, if u dont want to do any of your own research thats your choice, but dont be surprised when you are clueless on the topics

This post was edited by darkhead69 on Oct 15 2025 03:37am

a study showing 4-6% of people are "brainwashed" is all your data from the past 5-10 years?
What iam asking for is usually one line and a link to the publication. “We surveyed 1,000 people using an online questionnaire about their views on X, Y, and Z. The responses suggest that approximately 4–6% of participants could be considered ‘brainwashed,’ where ‘brainwashed’ is defined as meeting criteria A, B, and C.”

This post was edited by BaHgerAUT on Oct 15 2025 03:51am

I told you Q made that post several times stating this, do i know how they came to the conclusion of 4-6% , no . But i do know we've had much proof that the Q operation is in fact real and the Trump administration is behind the Q team.
2. and the operation isnt even done yet, so you wouldnt be able to even calculate that yet would you , its not over. So again your question is moronic.
I've made many posts in this thread and have another thread from a few years ago with hundreds of pages of posts with information, so to state the 4-6% screenshot of all the data i have shown is dumb

you add nothing to this thread so do not expect any more responses, its pointless speaking to you, i have posted much information that you seem to have ignored and want to focus on one thing that i already responded to. Your just trolling, you have done zero research which means you cannot add anything of substance to this thread.

This post was edited by darkhead69 on Oct 15 2025 03:55am

You're basically confirming right now that your entire worldview is based on "trust me, bro."

This post was edited by BaHgerAUT on Oct 15 2025 03:55am

no, thats the conclusion you came to because your clueless, i told u who to follow and who to watch and you said your to busy to do that. your attempt at troll humor sucks.
You being to busy to listen to a podcast has nothing to do with me not having proof, it has to do with you ignoring information i post.
If your to busy to watch/listen/read the things i post thats your problem, but to say your to busy then go ahead and say i post no proof is moronic.

lets start simple go listen to Defcon Zerq on Rumble, there are now 13 episodes, much evidence there. Now you can not watch it and make stupid jokes and accuse me of posting no proof but you would be a clown and wrong for doing so. Again a you problem not a me problem

Here i will even link u the page if your that lazy. Start with episode 1. If you choose not to watch/listen then you cant say there is no proof, all that will conclude is you are a clown
https://rumble.com/search/all?q=defcon%20zerq

Either your to busy to watch/listen to the proof i post or im not posting any proof. It CANT be Both, which is what you stated ....which means your trolling or clueless either of which means you have been exposed and will no longer get a response.

This post was edited by darkhead69 on Oct 15 2025 04:11am