d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Football & Rugby > Official Philadelphia Eagles Fan Thread
Prev1337338339340341416Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 149,939
Joined: Apr 19 2005
Gold: 0.11
Oct 13 2025 05:34pm
If you're leading by 10, then they score a TD to bring it to 3, then you score a TD 4 minutes later it was only ever a close game for 4 minutes.


Would you not considering holding a team that scored an average of 40.25 points per game in their last 4 games, to 17, a dominant effort?

All I keep hearing from you on these talking points is the

A: The Eagles beat the Chiefs in the super bowl last year
B:You cherry picking the closest score of the game as far as you can in the game

Its like you're intentionally being ignorant bceause you live in a delusion.

Little over a month from now, your team will not be holding those lions to 17 points.


Next week we'll beat the Raiders 34-20, and you'll poinpoint 15:00 in the 1st quarter and how it was a tie game :rofl:


No idea why you're writing a novel but a 1 or 2 score game is not domination homie. Period.
Member
Posts: 3,281
Joined: Aug 23 2023
Gold: 0.00
Oct 13 2025 05:35pm
No idea why you're writing a novel but a 1 or 2 score game is not domination homie. Period.


Holding a team who scored 40.25 points per game the last 4 games to 17, then beating them by 13 is domination. Homie.

You wouldn't know anything about that though :bonk: :rofl:
Member
Posts: 149,939
Joined: Apr 19 2005
Gold: 0.11
Oct 13 2025 06:50pm
Holding a team who scored 40.25 points per game the last 4 games to 17, then beating them by 13 is domination. Homie.

You wouldn't know anything about that though :bonk: :rofl:


Doesn't matter what you hold them to if its a good ass game and they're within striking distance in the 4th quarter...
Member
Posts: 3,281
Joined: Aug 23 2023
Gold: 0.00
Oct 13 2025 07:15pm
Doesn't matter what you hold them to if its a good ass game and they're within striking distance in the 4th quarter...


Within striking distance??? Brother they never possessed the ball with a chance to lead in the 2nd half. :rofl:
Member
Posts: 149,939
Joined: Apr 19 2005
Gold: 0.11
Oct 13 2025 09:35pm
Within striking distance??? Brother they never possessed the ball with a chance to lead in the 2nd half. :rofl:


A two score game IS NOT A BLOWOUT fyi

Just ya know, if you were wondering....
Member
Posts: 1,869
Joined: Feb 26 2025
Gold: 0.00
Oct 13 2025 09:36pm
A two score game IS NOT A BLOWOUT fyi

Just ya know, if you were wondering....


take the L
Member
Posts: 3,281
Joined: Aug 23 2023
Gold: 0.00
Oct 13 2025 10:04pm
A two score game IS NOT A BLOWOUT fyi

Just ya know, if you were wondering....


I didn't call it a blowout, FYI. Maybe that's your problem, you keep reading me saying DOMINANT or DOMINANCE and your little Philly brain turns it into BLOWOUT for some reason. The two terms are not the same.

A 16-3 game is a dominant win, but not a blowout. A 40-33 game is neither. A 40-3 game is a blowout.

Happy to educate you today :bonk:
Member
Posts: 149,939
Joined: Apr 19 2005
Gold: 0.11
Oct 13 2025 10:13pm
I didn't call it a blowout, FYI. Maybe that's your problem, you keep reading me saying DOMINANT or DOMINANCE and your little Philly brain turns it into BLOWOUT for some reason. The two terms are not the same.

A 16-3 game is a dominant win, but not a blowout. A 40-33 game is neither. A 40-3 game is a blowout.

Happy to educate you today :bonk:


A dominant win is winning by a LOT, and having overwhelmingly better stats. The Chiefs had neither...

Good lord even just Google the definition of a dominant win and educate yourself. This isn't a hill you wanna die on, even though you're fighting for your life to do so.

Member
Posts: 3,281
Joined: Aug 23 2023
Gold: 0.00
Oct 13 2025 11:34pm
A dominant win is winning by a LOT, and having overwhelmingly better stats. The Chiefs had neither...

Good lord even just Google the definition of a dominant win and educate yourself. This isn't a hill you wanna die on, even though you're fighting for your life to do so.


No, a dominant win is *NOT* winning by a lot, that's a blowout. Quit backpedaling from your misread/misunderstanding.

A dominant game is a game where you're in control. The Chiefs spending the entire second half of the game against the Lions never giving them a chance to possess the ball to take the lead, was dominant.


Per Merriam Webster: "a: commanding, controlling, or prevailing over all others"

That's exactly what I just said about the Chiefs win over the Lions. :bonk:

Seems this isn't a hill you want to die on. And FWIW, you never want to battle me over terminology, technicality, or otherwise, I will firmly *DOMINATE* you.
Member
Posts: 149,939
Joined: Apr 19 2005
Gold: 0.11
Oct 14 2025 02:02pm
No, a dominant win is *NOT* winning by a lot, that's a blowout. Quit backpedaling from your misread/misunderstanding.

A dominant game is a game where you're in control. The Chiefs spending the entire second half of the game against the Lions never giving them a chance to possess the ball to take the lead, was dominant.


Per Merriam Webster: "a: commanding, controlling, or prevailing over all others"

That's exactly what I just said about the Chiefs win over the Lions. :bonk:

Seems this isn't a hill you want to die on. And FWIW, you never want to battle me over terminology, technicality, or otherwise, I will firmly *DOMINATE*you.


You arent dominating a team that is within 3 pts in the final quarter of the game with identical numbers.

Period.

You sound silly arguing otherwise.
Go Back To Football & Rugby Topic List
Prev1337338339340341416Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll