I answered the question if you actually bothered to read the comment you quoted.
your post stated not a single policy, you used blanket words that mean nothing because people within those realms still have different ideas, so much so that it might be drastically so.
My priorities aren’t priorities for either major party. I think the biggest danger to our society by about 50,000 miles is the polarization and hyper partisanship we’re seeing. Much of it’s fed by weaponized media and misinformation. In terms of actual policies the things I want most are voting reforms to reduce the influence of our 2-party system and promote more centrist/moderate/reasonable candidates, namely: ranked choice voting, jungle primaries and non-partisan redistricting commissions. But those things aren’t happening, at least on a large scale. So beyond that I guess it’s which candidate at least has their constituents best interests at heart (or at least is something that’s a consideration).
this is more specific, to your edit, but tbh it is still kind of vague.
I'd argue that if you said something along the lines of 'i want term limits in congress and senate because despite the fact that presidents will probably be apart of the 50/50, mixing up the house/senate full of other potential people due to others becmoing ineligible due to their length of prior terms would allow more voices into the lawmaking and upholding process'
that'd be a good policy point
This post was edited by Ryvulet on Oct 7 2025 06:40pm