The out of africa hypothesis is a politically manipulated lie, just like the rest of academia.
Anyone who goes against it is ostracized and all funding is removed.
Out of Africa theory is being modified by DNA studies. People didn't leave Africa at once but in waves. Subsequent waves mixed with previous ones who had already had phenotypical adaptation to the climate of the area. The same DNA sequence showed homo sapiens almost died out long ago. This is why the genetic variation among modern humans is so low compared to other animals. Same study showed, Cro Magnon people (arachaic Eoropeans) who arrived 40 000y ago to Europe mixed with Neanderthals there (previous out of Africa wave). Their descendants are mostly extinct nowadays. True European ancestry is only prevalent in Finland. Most of the "whites" of nowadays are a mix between settlers from middle east some 7000 years ago and hunter/gatherers from eastern Europe as far as Ural mountains.
Look at a typical European: long legs, short torso mostly rounded cranium. Brow ridges are still prevalent, hair was added later as climate adaptations, fairer skin as well, thin bones due to lack of vitamin D, weaker muscular developent due to lack of vitamins, easier to get fat because of the possible hunger periods, the chin grew back as people started cooking instead of chewing everything raw. European jaw is still more similar to African one than to the central asian one with small receded chins and even more pronounced nose. People who are the farthest from Africans are Japanese and northern Chinese. If you look at it geographically, it all makes sense. Our ancestors fucked around whenever they could with whomever they could kinda like today.
This post was edited by babun1024 on Oct 5 2025 02:26pm