i agree, and to add more context i brought this up months ago when the "defund israel" talks started. we only provide something like 3% of their budget. so stopping it wont make a significant impact on their activity.

if i had my way i'd make an easy change that would send a signal to them. no more treasury buying with our aid package. and we need an itemized list of what it's spent on. i wouldnt even day 1 take it away. israel currently gets a boat load of literal cash, then buys US treasury bonds with it, accrues interest and they dump the bonds, then they spend it on stuff without even telling us what they spent it on. that's outrageous.

but hey, JFK asked for inspections on their nuclear sites, and i forget what happened to him just a few months later, but.....

now now settle down Snipa

JFK pissed off a lot of people. Israel, the US intel community, US conservatives with racial equality talks, even his own party with all but buying the primary election. The only one we can safely say didn't kill JFK was Marilyn Monroe, she was happy sharing the brothers.

I was having a conversation with a stranger yesterday. he said something like this. i responded with: We landed on the moon. 30 minutes later i finally managed to escape his wacky theories.

best to never dive too deep, most people miss that memo.

and while i think there's a very real chance Israel was involved in the assassination of JFK I dont make the crucial mistake most do. they find motive, or even evidence israel was involved in something, then they ignore any other possibility. "did you know jack ruby's last name was rubenstein, see israel did it". same goes for any of the other "it was secretly jews" theories, 9-11, iraq war, etc. there are always a large number of other key players that could have benefitted from these things as much or even more than israel. they dont rule the world, even if they do punch way above their weight class.

It was you who failed to grasp my argument with a poor analogy. Don't try to shift blame on me for your failed attempt at a strawman.



No user have responded in earnest to my post.

As it went to deaf ears with a previous user, I implore you to contrast both societies. Let's see how in touch with reality you really are.

If you truly are approaching this with honesty you will be able to differentiate flawed decision making with societal norms.

Good luck

Well, OK. challenge accepted. ill write something for you tomorrow.

jews did jfk
I mean he definitely did jews at some point, he did everything with 2 legs

Jews usually have three legs

in the meantime - "Israel's acting ambassador to Spain: Spanish gov't contributing to rise in antisemitism"

that is the same ambassador that was previously Israel's acting ambassador to Ireland. So Job done in Ireland, and soon Job done in Spain. good riddance.