d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Nationalized, Socialized Healthcare In 2025
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 28,970
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
Sep 30 2025 04:10pm
I'd love if they just taxed everyone a little to cover emergency healthcare and medications for every legal US citizen.

But UnitedHealthCare already embezzle billions of money the government gives them to manage Medicare and Medicaid
Couldn't trust them with more money for shit


While I support this system being from Canada. The issue as a person who takes care of themselves is that the majority of the population no longer do and its even worse in the USA.

The USA and even partly Canada are disgustingly obese, largely seditary, and have in general littler regards for their health.

I'd like to see some changes to Canada where guidelines are set that actually bar people from access to public health funds due to poor life choices. Now where do we draw that line and how do we make that judgement call that's the difficult part. Hurt while speeding / doing something illegal, should that not be covered? Obese? Doing highly risky legal activities. It's a hard line to draw in the sand but a start would be ideal.

This post was edited by SBD on Sep 30 2025 04:10pm
Member
Posts: 57,214
Joined: Oct 14 2010
Gold: 57,480.92
Sep 30 2025 04:52pm
While I support this system being from Canada. The issue as a person who takes care of themselves is that the majority of the population no longer do and its even worse in the USA.

The USA and even partly Canada are disgustingly obese, largely seditary, and have in general littler regards for their health.

I'd like to see some changes to Canada where guidelines are set that actually bar people from access to public health funds due to poor life choices. Now where do we draw that line and how do we make that judgement call that's the difficult part. Hurt while speeding / doing something illegal, should that not be covered? Obese? Doing highly risky legal activities. It's a hard line to draw in the sand but a start would be ideal.


They used to do that with insurance in the states before obamacare. Now they can't deny people for preexisting conditions. Honestly Healthcare wasn't that insane of an issue until rent and mortgages started creeping into unaffordability over the last couple decades.
Now businesses are failing left and right because most people spend over half their income on housing and can't afford anything extra. Hell a blown tire puts most people in the red now.
Member
Posts: 50,666
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,866.00
Sep 30 2025 05:01pm
While I support this system being from Canada. The issue as a person who takes care of themselves is that the majority of the population no longer do and its even worse in the USA.

The USA and even partly Canada are disgustingly obese, largely seditary, and have in general littler regards for their health.

I'd like to see some changes to Canada where guidelines are set that actually bar people from access to public health funds due to poor life choices. Now where do we draw that line and how do we make that judgement call that's the difficult part. Hurt while speeding / doing something illegal, should that not be covered? Obese? Doing highly risky legal activities. It's a hard line to draw in the sand but a start would be ideal.


Or we could just nationalize the entire health industry, put funding and mandates into radical intervention drugs that people would want to use to mitigate their poor lifestyle choices and make them widely available for free. The obvious examples being Ozempic and STD / HIV treatment drugs.
Now what exactly is the downside in a well managed system that does all of this? People who are obese and sedentary might have an incentive to actually take up active lifestyles if easily available drugs will provide them the fitness and energy to go outside and stop being slobs, and there would be a much stronger cultural taboo and social pressure to stop being a human lard roll if its an easily available choice instead of something that requires hard work and discipline. We clearly have the technological means within our grasp, and a combination of bureaucracy and politics are holding us back, namely the capitalist system that incentivizes the farming of our proletariat masses. Former generations just mistook them as being the hard working means of production when they were really swine and cash cows
Member
Posts: 9,097
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Sep 30 2025 06:48pm
Can we just make it so the cost of a newborn baby natural birth is less than open heart surgery for a geezer?
Member
Posts: 28,970
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
Sep 30 2025 08:49pm
Can we just make it so the cost of a newborn baby natural birth is less than open heart surgery for a geezer?


Best I can do is put tarrifs on kitchen and bathroom cabinets.
Member
Posts: 15,472
Joined: Apr 17 2006
Gold: 13,930.41
Sep 30 2025 09:09pm
Oh yes, I’d love to spend more tax money on lazy leeches. Sign me up!

Why do socialists believe they’re entitled to other peoples belongings?


You... You do realize that universal healthcare has been proven time and time again to be much cheaper than privatized insurance, right? You might want to look into it.
Member
Posts: 9,097
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Sep 30 2025 09:20pm
Best I can do is put tarrifs on kitchen and bathroom cabinets.


Damn, we don't even have houses tho
Member
Posts: 49,886
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Sep 30 2025 10:32pm
Oh yes, I’d love to spend more tax money on lazy leeches. Sign me up!

Why do socialists believe they’re entitled to other peoples belongings?


Because socialists fucking built the health care system from the ground up, without government grant money and subsidies the entire industry collapses.
Now why do YOU think big pharma is entitled to MY money?
Member
Posts: 5,520
Joined: Feb 10 2006
Gold: 3,315.00
Sep 30 2025 11:34pm
Because socialists fucking built the health care system from the ground up, without government grant money and subsidies the entire industry collapses.
Now why do YOU think big pharma is entitled to MY money?


They’re not, you should be able to go insurance free if you want to. That’s another example of democrat authoritarianism.
Member
Posts: 50,666
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,866.00
Sep 30 2025 11:51pm
You... You do realize that universal healthcare has been proven time and time again to be much cheaper than privatized insurance, right? You might want to look into it.


Except it hasn't. In fact numerous cases where universal healthcare has broken down with failure to deliver benefits or moves to socialize healthcare have skyrocketed prices, most obviously the ACA as an example. Premiums tripled for a lot of people who lost their doctors anyway, thanks Obama. How much of that 400b income for unitedhealth is coming from taxpayer subsidization right now?

There are obvious pitfalls on the way to a functional socialized healthcare system and the democrats have figured out how to step on every rake. You can't massively expand benefits being paid out without offsetting it with increased revenue, and the uninsurables and ER walk-ins put vastly disproportionate strain on limited resources. Yet just 5 years ago, every single democrat on stage for the last real presidential primary raised their hand to say they would provide taxpayer funded healthcare for illegal aliens. Which is moronic.

We need to actually cut the costs, which could mean nationalizing the production, nationalizing research, providing the interventions that would lead the populace away from being fat and lazy drug addicts, and cut off the services we shouldn't be providing.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll