d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Censorship Under Joe Biden
Prev123456Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 41,909
Joined: Jan 20 2006
Gold: 3,667.67
Sep 25 2025 01:49pm
Fyi, Biden isnt potus anymore.


Hope this helps.


i guess you cant debate policy of the past anymore. tell the supreme court asap.
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Sep 25 2025 02:04pm
on the bright side we now have remote work and hybrid work

dunno how the hell i got up at 5am to catch a train for so many years


Remote work and hybrid work are fer the birds.

Put some pants on and get to work.
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Sep 25 2025 02:11pm
if the spreading of misinformation can lead to significant harm to the public, the government has a duty to intervene. lots of dumb people ended up with dying from what was a largely treatable disease.

https://i.imgur.com/38lRNbU.png


The government has no scientific authority, nor should they. Scientists don’t have that authority either.

The scientific method fundamentally rejects authority because facts change over time. This is made easier when people are allowed to question the currently established facts. Our facts will not stand the test of time, all of recorded history is proof of this. Letting your leaders hammer current facts into stone is lunacy.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Sep 25 2025 02:43pm
The government has no scientific authority, nor should they. Scientists don’t have that authority either.

The scientific method fundamentally rejects authority because facts change over time. This is made easier when people are allowed to question the currently established facts. Our facts will not stand the test of time, all of recorded history is proof of this. Letting your leaders hammer current facts into stone is lunacy.


How do you suggest we approach a subsequent public health issues. Ignore medical science? That's what we currently have with the drive to remove flouride from drinking water.

This post was edited by duffman316 on Sep 25 2025 02:43pm
Member
Posts: 17,248
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Sep 25 2025 02:52pm
How do you suggest we approach a subsequent public health issues. Ignore medical science? That's what we currently have with the drive to remove flouride from drinking water.


Drinking fluoride is also fer the birds. Brush your teeth, you savages.

If by “a subsequent public health issue” you mean something similar to covid I think the answer is clear. If you’re sick don’t go to work. Don’t visit your grandmom.

Don’t fucking shut down the world because a guy in a lab coat is scared. Guy doesn’t know a fucking thing about the economy—how many people are going to starve because he was worried about his pops, how many people won’t seek life saving medical attention for cancer, heart attacks and strokes, how many abused children will be stuck with their abusers and completely cut off from teachers, babysitters and friends’ parents, which are the people who report child abuse.

Covid lockdowns were a far bigger public health issue than covid. I suggest we don’t listen to the people who forced that to happen ever again.

This post was edited by Shadowoffury on Sep 25 2025 02:54pm
Member
Posts: 5,520
Joined: Feb 10 2006
Gold: 3,315.00
Sep 25 2025 05:37pm
How do you suggest we approach a subsequent public health issues. Ignore medical science? That's what we currently have with the drive to remove flouride from drinking water.


Actually the Biden administration did ignore science. They claimed “follow the science” but they didn’t.

During the time they were forcing two shots into everyone - there were already peer reviewed studies showing that if someone already had COVID, the first shot gave them a huge immune response, and the 2nd shot did nothing and just put them at more risk for complications with no benefit.

You can actually look up the papers and check the dates, and go back and check CDC guidance, this is actual fact.

Follow the science? Go ahead, I’ll be awaiting your excuse and cope for the Biden regime.

I’ll just add that this is one of the main factors that drove me to vote republican. I was threatened into taking a loosely tested vaccine, and on top of that since I had already had Covid, I was overdosed on it as well. Yeah no thanks, definitely not signing up for more of that.

This post was edited by xxsjxx1 on Sep 25 2025 05:41pm
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Sep 25 2025 07:20pm
Actually the Biden administration did ignore science. They claimed “follow the science” but they didn’t.

During the time they were forcing two shots into everyone - there were already peer reviewed studies showing that if someone already had COVID, the first shot gave them a huge immune response, and the 2nd shot did nothing and just put them at more risk for complications with no benefit.

You can actually look up the papers and check the dates, and go back and check CDC guidance, this is actual fact.

Follow the science? Go ahead, I’ll be awaiting your excuse and cope for the Biden regime.

I’ll just add that this is one of the main factors that drove me to vote republican. I was threatened into taking a loosely tested vaccine, and on top of that since I had already had Covid, I was overdosed on it as well. Yeah no thanks, definitely not signing up for more of that.


Look i dont have a medical degree, and neither do you. At some point you gotta roll the dice with trusting the consensus within the medical community or playing armchair medical expert and doing your own research.

I lived through that time period too and I also did my research. 3% chance of dying from covid vs several orders of magnitude less likely chance of complications from vaccines that were being developed. Those were the facts that I worked with when I chose to get the shots.

I was on the flip side of your scenario where I had to tell people get vaccinated or lose your job. Wasn't my call but if idiots would just stay at home for two weeks when they got sick we wouldn't have had to go that far to deal with assholes who think its OK to go around infecting as many people as they can.
Member
Posts: 15,472
Joined: Apr 17 2006
Gold: 13,930.41
Sep 25 2025 08:38pm


Meanwhile, in current times...

"Buh buh buh Trump had nothing to do with it!!"





This post was edited by Pyrotechx on Sep 25 2025 08:39pm
Member
Posts: 15,918
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Sep 26 2025 01:28am
if the spreading of misinformation can lead to significant harm to the public, the government has a duty to intervene. lots of dumb people ended up with dying from what was a largely treatable disease.

https://i.imgur.com/38lRNbU.png


Funny to see you carry on now who is grasping

People were forced to take an experimental shot not knowing if it was going to harm them.

Quick reminder you just said you don't agree with people losing their jobs / back accounts etc over this well they did and now it's clear you agree with what the government did.

Well that was EZ


Fyi, Biden isnt potus anymore.


Hope this helps.


No one claimed he's still POTUS smarty pants this topic is about google admitting censorship under Biden.

The news article I linked in the OP dates September 23, 2025 you could have checked that.

Hope that helps but I doubt it, lol

Member
Posts: 31,873
Joined: Oct 25 2005
Gold: 3,873.50
Warn: 10%
Sep 26 2025 01:39am
Funny to see you carry on now who is grasping

People were forced to take an experimental shot not knowing if it was going to harm them.

Quick reminder you just said you don't agree with people losing their jobs / back accounts etc over this well they did and now it's clear you agree with what the government did.

Well that was EZ




No one claimed he's still POTUS smarty pants this topic is about google admitting censorship under Biden.

The news article I linked in the OP dates September 23, 2025 you could have checked that.

Hope that helps but I doubt it, lol


OK. Almost like this thread is just a deflection from the current potus' attack against free speech.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123456Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll