This analogy would only hold up if Horst Wessel was assassinated by a Jewish freemason or something along those lines.
The death of Charlie Kirk wouldn't make nearly the same waves if he had died in a pub fight or a traffic accident and the other guy happened to be a Democrat, because the event leading to his death would have been nonpolitical, just like the death of Horst Wessel mostly was.
But that's not what happened. Kirk dedicated his life to the modern conservative movement, of which he was one of the main architects - and he was assassinated in cold blood precisely because of this role. Tyler Robinson, a crazed leftist radicalized by inflammatory rhetoric about how every member of the "MAGA right" is a dangerous fascist gunning to put people like his ""girl""friend into concentration camps, made a calculated decision to take out one of the most effective leaders and spokespersons of contemporary conservatism. This event crossed a major red line and absolutely does call for political and legal consequences.
You, however, have learned nothing and go straight back to the very same rhetoric about how Trump and MAGA supporters are the 2nd coming of the nazis and chomping at the bit to abolish democracy and constitutional rights. Even when you try to deflect and stall the well-justified calls for consequences from this tragedy, you just can't help yourself and pull the material for your shameful gaslighting attempt from the same, poisoned well.
https://i.imgur.com/4Hm8xq3.pngYou are part of the problem. You're literally equating Kirk with shoveling Jews into ovens. It's no wonder some weak-minded dolt decided he needed to "do something about it," because he's got people like you constantly reinforcing the notion that you're in a fight against actual Nazis. Next time, just shut the fuck up.
if this isn't reflective of contemporary political discourse, I don't know what is