I don't remember anyone saying jalapeños was ai! I'm not saying it didn't happen but I don't remember!

what? your post makes no sense.

if you mean what i think you do then i said earlier it was to keep the conversations civil. without a consequence for unchecked rage there is no conversation. just bashing with no debate or discussion.

you can learn to disagree with others without personal attacks. then no warn for you.

you provide an example?

since you switching the conversation from what to do with 10% ers to how one gets the %

fallacy is "red herring" i chose to accept your fallacy

This post was edited by TiStuff on Sep 18 2025 12:09am

I think what he's getting at is General Chat tells PaRD to keep PaRD out of General Chat! But when PaRD locks 10% warn users out, the PaRD users come to General Chat! There was talk earlier about GCers reporting PaRD members as a troll to get PaRD users 10%!

Nope. Never used it as a means to post. Only when asked by jsp'rs to see how it would respond. So, always with consent. I do still use it at home for when hobby coding. I love C# as a programming language. So, it is what I use to explore different approaches to problems.

example of what? your unchecked rage?

click your post history and try to read it as an unbiased person. pretend you have no opinions on certain matters and read what you typed.

i dont even like the word
pard...
sounds derogatory

What about GCer?

i would definitely disagree with that. its not a troll thing to get them stuck here longer. the gc folk i know want the pard folk back in pard.

the problem is that most pard folk make politics their whole personality. their whole life. so they cant even talk without it devolving into politics.

if i brought up my weekend for example. i was putting a fence up. what would the pard folk turn that into? did you guess it?

solid improvement