d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Free Speech Activists
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 56,894
Joined: Nov 7 2009
Gold: 2,195.68
Sep 14 2025 11:28am
Isn't this what we've heard called "consequence culture" for the past decade or so when people violated taboos erected by the left :lol: ? I largely agree with Yascha Mounk that unless there's some sort of law passed to protect people from being punished by their employers for speech uttered outside of the workplace, this will continually be a problem.
Member
Posts: 41,909
Joined: Jan 20 2006
Gold: 3,667.67
Sep 14 2025 11:35am
Isn't this what we've heard called "consequence culture" for the past decade or so when people violated taboos erected by the left :lol: ? I largely agree with Yascha Mounk that unless there's some sort of law passed to protect people from being punished by their employers for speech uttered outside of the workplace, this will continually be a problem.


these people can just post anon but they cant let go of the ego and self importance of thinking they are someone so they post from accounts tied to their life and workplace.
Member
Posts: 21,958
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 331,454.58
Sep 14 2025 11:37am
Isn't this what we've heard called "consequence culture" for the past decade or so when people violated taboos erected by the left :lol: ? I largely agree with Yascha Mounk that unless there's some sort of law passed to protect people from being punished by their employers for speech uttered outside of the workplace, this will continually be a problem.


I don't think from a legal standpoint that's the problem.
It's a reflection of your business when you have radical hateful people in your employment.

edit: those employees who went online and said inappropriate things, signed a contract. In that contract it outlines not saying crazy things on social media.

It was well within the companies legal, to fire them.

This post was edited by Mondain on Sep 14 2025 11:41am
Member
Posts: 729
Joined: Mar 10 2021
Gold: 2,803.41
Sep 14 2025 11:42am
A new wave of karens have gone into overdrive to protect the memory of their free speech champion and civil rights leader (who was against the civil rights act?) charlie kirk... by trying to ruin the livlihood of anyone that talks about who he was.

What kind of losers dedicate their lives to ruining the lives of others over the things they say on the internet?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/nazi-karens-full-cancel-culture-141914782.html

Keyboard warriors have reacted to this week’s assassination of self-anointed champion of “free speech” Charlie Kirk by launching an online campaign to get anyone who criticizes him fired from their jobs.

A website established three days ago under the somewhat overstated banner of “Expose Charlie’s Murderers” claims to have already collected over 30,000 social media profiles. The team behind the site now promises to create “a searchable database… filterable by general location and job industry.”

“This is a permanent and continuously-updating archive of Radical activists calling for violence,” the site adds. “This is the largest firing operation in history.”

The online effort kicked off after Kirk’s fellow far-right activist Laura Loomer announced on X that in response to his killing at a Turning Point USA event in Utah Wednesday, she would “make everyone I find online who celebrates his death famous.”

Other contributors to the campaign have been posting their efforts directly to X, along with commentary on the emotional toll of their online labors, earning themselves the moniker “Nazi Karens.”

https://i.imgur.com/zCpIZLd.png

Your the shittiest troll around
try again

Member
Posts: 5,223
Joined: Aug 3 2022
Gold: 0.00
Sep 14 2025 11:47am
Some people are insane and anyone with even two braincells knows if things were flopped the other direction those some people calling for firings would also be the same saying their free speech is being taken away.

There's always going to be these people.


Literally everyone in this thread is wrong

OP is wrong for thinking this has anything to do with free speech. You can be fired from private institutions (companies) for things you say. The first amendment does not protect you from private institutions.

People saying that cancelling people is fine are ignorant for not recognizing that they are perpetuating behavior that will come back and hurt them in the exact same way. You don't want to live in a world where your online posts can be weaponized against you. Imagine if a leftist comes into power and you get fired for says trans is mental illness 10 years ago
Member
Posts: 21,958
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 331,454.58
Sep 14 2025 11:51am
every company that I've worked for has made me sign a contract.

In that contract it outlines that I won't do or say anything to misrepresent the company, and other legalese language.
This includes on the job, in public and in private.

If any of you actually read your employment contract you'd know this is true...
Or you're a jobless welfare bum who's never had to sign a contract for employment.

Zero sympathy for people who signed a contract, then directly went against it.

This post was edited by Mondain on Sep 14 2025 11:52am
Member
Posts: 56,894
Joined: Nov 7 2009
Gold: 2,195.68
Sep 14 2025 11:52am
every company that I've worked for has made me sign a contract.

In that contract it outlines that I won't do or say anything to misrepresent the company, and other legalese language.
This includes on the job, in public and in private.

If any of you actually read your employment contract you'd know this is true...
Or you're a jobless welfare bum who's never had to sign a contract for employment.


Do we want corporations dictating what you're allowed to say outside of the workplace though?
Member
Posts: 21,958
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 331,454.58
Sep 14 2025 11:54am
Do we want corporations dictating what you're allowed to say outside of the workplace though?


do you pay your bills with their money outside of work?

Edit: nobody put a gun to your head and forced you to sign the contract.

This post was edited by Mondain on Sep 14 2025 11:56am
Member
Posts: 5,223
Joined: Aug 3 2022
Gold: 0.00
Sep 14 2025 11:57am
every company that I've worked for has made me sign a contract.

In that contract it outlines that I won't do or say anything to misrepresent the company, and other legalese language.
This includes on the job, in public and in private.

If any of you actually read your employment contract you'd know this is true...
Or you're a jobless welfare bum who's never had to sign a contract for employment.


Yes, and I say this even though I usually disagree with you. Private companies are not the government. People get this confused all the time and it will continue to be misunderstood

Free speech doesn't mean you can say anything without consequences. It doesn't mean that people aren't allowed to dislike you for what you say. In America, it's only supposed to mean the government can't write laws to stop you from saying certain types of speech. You still can't scream "FIRE!" in a crowded government building obviously

Your company could fire you for some things you said about Kirk, and another company could hire you or even prefer hiring you for saying it.

Do we want corporations dictating what you're allowed to say outside of the workplace though?


Yes we do
Member
Posts: 28,972
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
Sep 14 2025 12:29pm
Lmao you had the MSNBC person get fried but then on the other hand you have a fox news idiot saying homeless, mentally ill and disabled people not engaging in programs should just be given an involuntary lethal injection, just kill em.

They're all clowns.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll