i keep forgetting you used a flaws lens of religion in the way you see things
it is UNREASONABLE to claim this is political WITH THE CURRENT EVIDENCE contradicting itself(weird things he put on the ammo casing, contradicting information from family claiming he was of similar political viewpoint to him((which btw we can easily doubt the validity of these claims)))
charlie kirk was a hate spreading "borderline" fascist who openly supported policy change that can be considered literal fascism, did he deserve to die for it? probably not. but to claim he didn't have a significant hand in his own undoing is just so silly
I don't know what you mean by 'flaws lens of religion in the way you see things'
you are saying my worldview is flawed and yours is coherent? can you justify this position?
the current evidence is his parents said he has become more political in recent years and lashed out about charlie kirk saying he spread hate, while also writing anti-fascist messages on bullets he used to murder charlie kirk.
the family did not support the idea that he had a similar political ideology to charlie, and in fact explicitly hated him. I don't know where you are gathering this information from.
charlie kirk spreading hate is an opinion you would have to justify, I don't think it's a reasonable one. I think he spread an evangelical christian worldview which I also disagreed with on many places, but overall he was simply telling others what he believed to be true non-violently.
Which policy would you consider to be literal fascism?
This post was edited by majorblood on Sep 13 2025 12:42am