It's the internet and with anonymity comes exaggeration through jarring statements. Most would be as docile as a pussycat sunbathing in real life. We certainly do not need additional thought police looking into such things in a world where online freedom is quickly becoming under attack.

With that said, Charlie was respected by many for the opposite of the above. He would express his thoughts in person, an uncommon thing in today's online world.

Berni put out in my opinion one of the better statements on it.

This post was edited by SBD on Sep 12 2025 06:17am

Newsome did a really good statement as well.

Although I disagree with your first sentiment. Consequences should be had for making such statements at least investigating those individuals. This country would stop so many of these crimes if they started monitoring what people are saying online more. Wasn’t there a kid with a bunch of guns just a few days ago stopped this way?

Prosecuting people for their words, in response to a man being killed for his words, is hilariously ironic

Perhaps this is correct, maybe the line drawn is you're responsible for what you say online and can be subject to investigation, but there would be no limitations or enforcement to what one could say online.

Think that makes the most sense so that's probably correct.

READING COMPREHENSION is important. I said investigated. To make sure it’s just free speech and not something more. Not prosecuted for no reason. Don’t reach.

This post was edited by T3XBOT on Sep 12 2025 06:25am

I understood exactly what you meant and I said what I meant

Who are you choosing to investigate and who does the investigating? How is this any different than the current Internet where anyone can investigate anyone else if they have the time?

I think either the FBI or a new branch. They already do this in the US it’s just not focused a lot. They’ve been doing it on a small scale for decades.

I agree with the theoretical idea that if you monitor people in an unbiased way, it could prevent crime and make things better

I also agree with the idea that it's happening now to an extent

In reality, such a proposal is not going to be unbiased and you know it. Some people here wouldn't trust Biden to lead an FBI that has the power to investigate all their posts. Some people here wouldn't trust the current FBI either

It being unbiased or not is the unfortunate side effect of saving thousands of lives though. I can’t speak on how these organizations operate because it’s individual based but as someone who worked for the EPA I do know corruption can and does exist. That’s in EVERYTHING though. Churches, government, charities and anything that ever existed has been corrupted because HUMANS are corrupt.

Lololol god damn why you gotta go so hard on the left (and by left we know you mean black ppl)

Left, right, up, down. They're all idiots. Bunch of political gangs.

Anyways, thoughts and prayers. On a serious note, it's 1 guy who was completely okay with gun deaths, he said it himself. Like I said...keep it movin

This post was edited by Sixers on Sep 12 2025 07:02am