d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Charlie Kirk Assassination
Prev16061626364194Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 54,059
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Sep 11 2025 01:58pm
Yuppp totally relevant

https://i.imgur.com/ZnFcfFS.jpeg


Laura Loomer is a moron and a ghoul. Charlie Kirk was not. That pic confirms Kirk's quote, lol.
Member
Posts: 5,223
Joined: Aug 3 2022
Gold: 0.00
Sep 11 2025 02:01pm
The problem is the mentality and hypocrisy.

Advocating for murder because you don’t like someone’s opinion…

Then it’s cool if the same happens to them for their opinion?

I’m just looking for consistency.


You're expecting consistency but you're looking at opinions from millions of different people. In a country as large as the US, every type of person exists. You can find any type of person if you look for them

It's never cool to advocate for a murder on any side. The law is clear that even if you say vile stuff online, you are different than the person pulling the trigger. Maybe laws should change but that's a different topic
Member
Posts: 31,927
Joined: Sep 21 2007
Gold: 1,126.00
Sep 11 2025 02:01pm
The problem is the mentality and hypocrisy.

Advocating for murder because you don’t like someone’s opinion…

Then it’s cool if the same happens to them for their opinion?

I’m just looking for consistency.


I have never advocated for anyone's murder. I am the epitome of being a human (obviously joke since we all can work on ourselves).
Member
Posts: 92,906
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 11 2025 02:09pm
If the president tells a large group of people to march on the capitol and it results in the death of several people including a police officer, is he responsible?

Yes it is terrible to advocate for murder. There is a world of difference between saying vile things online and actually committing murder in real life


Trump said "Do X" and "Y" happened.

is he an idiot, sure. should he have told people to march TO the capital, no. did he say march INTO the capital? no, afaik.

the difference here is people have been actively saying Kirk and people like him deserve to die, and someone killed him. Democrats have been larping as 1930's anti-Nazi germans for almost a decade, and now its bearing mentally ill fruit.
Member
Posts: 47,303
Joined: Feb 16 2008
Gold: 400.00
Sep 11 2025 02:09pm
I never equated advocating murder online to actually doing it.


WELL I AM.


if you wish murder in your mind, you're basically that already, rip that soul.

This post was edited by FoolsChance on Sep 11 2025 02:09pm
Member
Posts: 5,223
Joined: Aug 3 2022
Gold: 0.00
Sep 11 2025 02:14pm
Trump said "Do X" and "Y" happened.

is he an idiot, sure. should he have told people to march TO the capital, no. did he say march INTO the capital? no, afaik.

the difference here is people have been actively saying Kirk and people like him deserve to die, and someone killed him. Democrats have been larping as 1930's anti-Nazi germans for almost a decade, and now its bearing mentally ill fruit.


Trump saying "Do X" doesn't make him responsible for "Y". We agree. Seems like we also agree that it was dangerous and irresponsible to say such things

My point is that vile rhetoric online is not the same as murdering people in real life. The latter is a huge escalation. Some of those posters are literally 12-13 year old kids trolling on their tablets because they don't know better. Right wingers often forget that young people are all over the Internet.

Is it vile and dangerous? Yes.
Member
Posts: 5,524
Joined: Feb 10 2006
Gold: 3,315.00
Sep 11 2025 02:16pm
You're expecting consistency but you're looking at opinions from millions of different people. In a country as large as the US, every type of person exists. You can find any type of person if you look for them

It's never cool to advocate for a murder on any side. The law is clear that even if you say vile stuff online, you are different than the person pulling the trigger. Maybe laws should change but that's a different topic


The laws are fine. Freedom of speech is pretty universal as long as you aren’t making violent threats.


Homophobic people have the right to their beliefs. Racist people have the right to exist and to feel how they feel.

I like my freedoms and I take advantage of them. I’m a big advocate of free speech and guns. I don’t expect to be free while oppressing others. That’s the main issue I have with liberals and left wing people. They think that freedom only extends to things they like and they try to oppress everything else.

I’m also gay AF. I have to pretend I love AOC and Gavin Newsom just to get laid because I’m not allowed to think for myself 🤣
Member
Posts: 5,524
Joined: Feb 10 2006
Gold: 3,315.00
Sep 11 2025 02:18pm
I have never advocated for anyone's murder. I am the epitome of being a human (obviously joke since we all can work on ourselves).


I was using “you” in general not actually implying it towards you personally :)
Member
Posts: 31,927
Joined: Sep 21 2007
Gold: 1,126.00
Sep 11 2025 02:18pm
WELL I AM.


if you wish murder in your mind, you're basically that already, rip that soul.


I agree with that. Subhumans will subhuman. They just want someone else to do the job for them while they sit on their fat assess advocating for it online.
Member
Posts: 92,906
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 11 2025 02:22pm
Trump saying "Do X" doesn't make him responsible for "Y". We agree. Seems like we also agree that it was dangerous and irresponsible to say such things

My point is that vile rhetoric online is not the same as murdering people in real life. The latter is a huge escalation. Some of those posters are literally 12-13 year old kids trolling on their tablets because they don't know better. Right wingers often forget that young people are all over the Internet.

Is it vile and dangerous? Yes.


To be clear, my point is that right wing AND left wing politicians literally engage in open calls to violence and murder with their rhetoric. its just that most people can't be bothered to do it because they know it's bullshit, and wont throw their lives away for a lizard person's agenda. crazy people are happy to tho, on both sides.

how else can we categorize a "war on Christians", "war on white people", "trans genocide", "war on women", etc. All while constantly calling the other people equivalent to violent regimes from the Soviet Communists to German Nazis. If someone tells you that the literal nazis are coming to take away your freedom what is your response? if u dont get a gun and stop it you're as bad as the non-nazi germans who sat silent while jews were taken off to camps.

they are literally telling people to get violent, they're literally stoking a civil war, they're literally endorsing political violence. not implied, not vague. its clear as day. its modern US politics so settled people dont even bother to care.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev16061626364194Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll