Arguing that we shouldn’t bother with laws since criminals don’t follow them anyways probably isn’t the strongest argument.
thats not what im arguing,
but why put more laws when there are already some in place, if criminals ignore anyway. Or if someone follows all the laws... but someone robs them of their legally obtained firearm.
if u want to just say no more guns, fine say it lol..
but then u need to learn to bow hunt if u want to obtain meat, or rely on your government to provide u cricket meal to cook. Or if you are part of the vulnerable population just hope you dont get attacked physically with little to no chance of defense.
or if government or somebody deems jsp users are to be arrested or prosecuted or worse, then we cant band together in a hope of standing up for our freedom or lives. (this is just an hypothetical example)
but just understand. there are many guns out there, once law abiding citizens no longer have, hopefully the criminals were the first in line to turn theirs in. hopefully other countries dont sell guns to criminals here,
in the spirit of Charlie Kirk, explain to me your arguement and how it would work.