Regarding the remote impact bit

I'd think an american president that wages a moronic trade war with every country has had a detrimental impact on the livelihoods of far more people globally than any other president of the last few decades.

TDS TMZ

you'd have a problem with pamela harris or who ever was running against him, what would the problem be?

She wants to give parents the permission to make their 9 year old kids transgender, because its their god given right to be whichever gender they'd like to affiliate with.

and yes it does exist just look up the TLC Program in the life of jazz or something like that, his parents were dressing up in dresses before he even started kindergarten.

i didn't even know if my shoes fit at age 9, the only thing new shoes represented to me at 9 years old was clean and fresh.

imo, if you got a problem with trump you'd have a much bigger problem with pamela harris, just be glad you got the lesser of 2 evils

This post was edited by TastyTaste on Sep 5 2025 09:06am

They just have a problem with hearing it said blunt.

they like the beat around the bush propoganda so they can spin in into 10 directions instead of meaning what it means.

What up duffman, still on the Master yi Grind?

In relatable news, the bigger reason why Trump is Taxing all these trades is because our country is 40 something trillion dollars in debt, and that needs to be paid for some how.

If there was ever a reason to raise a problem with what Trump is doing it was when he barrowed 8 trillion dollars for stimulus checks during covid 19.

Complaining that the poor pay for all of the debts? its because we generate the majority of the debts...

wtf you talking about im not causing debt on this country... well do you have a car loan or is it paid off, a mortgage? Student Loans...

its all luxury debt our country allows.

I'm trying to figure out which weaselly bullshit phrase used by journoshits with zero integrity bothers me more
"video resurfaces" or "claims without evidence"

These are two really common tropes. Its not just Trump specific by any stretch. Hell, just do a google search for "claims without evidence" in quotation marks on google news.
I get a story like;
>Trump doubles down on claims, without evidence, that Biden aides illegally used autopen
by ABC
Trump presents his evidence of autopen abuse. That reports to media said members of Biden's cabinet handed over the autopen controls to staffers. That Biden made a blanket statement taking credit for autopen use by staffers. That Biden exhibited obvious signs of lack of mental fitness but signed 4000+ pardons in the last month, 1500 in a single day. That there is a total lack of transparency on who had access to it. That Biden was hand-signing bills on the same day and time as his autopen signed executive orders on August 3rd 2022.

Does any of this prove misuse of the autopen? No. Is any of the evidence particularly convincing? Probably not. Even if you could prove it was used without Biden's knowledge, a plenary power of the executive is still plenary and he could lawfully delegate its execution and we have no way to split hairs over how he does it. Any scandal would be purely political, rather than criminal or constitutional. Biden was elected president and if he says those orders came from him, they did.
BUT
Trump absolutely fucking presented evidence. His claim was made with an abundance of evidence, enough to support his claim.
The journalists that use bullshit like "without evidence" are the ones blatantly lying.


Then we have "video resurfaces"
Who the fuck is 'resurfacing' the video? The muckrackers who dug for it and reported it. It already existed and was out there in public view, they just want to post a video from years ago and get clicks on their videos so they can harvest ad revenue in current day. "Video comes back to haunt him". Same shit. Nothing new is being reported, it isn't news, there are no new angles or details. Events are occurring in the world around us and actually having impacts on peoples lives, and the MSM wants to talk about Jeffrey Epstein for the 1000th news cycle because they think they can smear Trump somehow.

Triple posting just shows that you are emotional.

My single post has more words than his triple post (402 v 291) so I'm way more tilted, checkmate atheists

You good buddy?

Nah i just cant copy paste on this damn government computer