here are my rambling thoughts
today ai is a tool that still requires critical thinking skills to be useful
it has a hallucination problem, requiring human oversight. this also makes it not ideal for things that make life impacting decisions (i.e. someone is hurt)
can it be abused? yes. largely companies have been putting in guardrails to promote responsible ai for better ai adoption
if viewed as a tool, it can help accelerate learning and enhance certain work processes
the onus is on those leveraging it, so if too heavily relied upon without fully understand its strengths/weaknesses it is a good way to make yourself look like an ass
i think ai could be a tremendous opportunity (for anyone young and old) to those that learn its strengths and weaknesses and use it effectively
companies are spending huge money on ai talent and datacenters. they expect an roi on these investments
you mention an outsourcing problem - comes down to labor cost im sure. unless physical presence is required
college education - only going up in price. i dont think college degrees are going anywhere as a 'baseline' form of education. hireability is an aggregate of education, certs, experience, each having certain weight to certain employers. then theres "who you know", which the 3 aforementioned can have an impact.
colleges lag fast paced industries, but short of starting your own and having the right
that said college no longer seems be a guaranteed way to land a good job (i think weve know this for 10+ years now with the student loan crisis). it basically comes down to you networking and forming connections
AI does currently need human oversight and without a doubt provides utility but I don't think its hard to envision advancements in it where suddenly you have a single supervisor oversing an AI that now does the work of 10 former junior staff and I don't know that the replacement rate of other jobs created via AI will ever match the displacement.
When we think about companies utilizing it efficiently / effectively, sort of one thing comes to mind, cost reduction. Prior to the 80s there was tremendous focus on workers, workers rights, affordable xyz to promote good workers. Enter Regan and Thatcher things started to change in the workplace. CEO compensations boomed, workers rights begin to dissapear, focus went on shareholder returns and have only slid further that way to current day and now the dream of a home, family and a vehicle is dead for most, especially Gen Z.
Your major companies post 80s are completely driven by different values than your pre 80s in my opinion and so they're going to utilize these things in an unfavourable way to the general work-force and I think you're ultimately already seeing the beginning of it in post-graduate unemployment rates.
We have a bit of a storm brewing, the erosion of workers rights, the rise in AI and the use of out of country outsourcing all combined with a shareholder return focused market that promotes heavy cost gutting, stock buybacks and trading multiples that require companies to continue unrealistic growth trends for the next 50 years.
This post was edited by SBD on Aug 20 2025 10:07am