Born in 1996 in Jabalia refugee camp, Gaza’s largest and most densely populated, al-Sharif grew up amid ongoing conflict and hardship (Jabalia was established after the 1948 Arab-Israeli War). Between 1996 and 2014, al-Sharif’s childhood and adolescence unfolded against the backdrop of the Second Intifada, repeated Israeli military operations in Gaza, and a tightening Israeli and Egyptian blockade imposed after Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007. The siege caused severe shortages of food, medicine, and fuel, leading to widespread suffering. Based on available sources, little is known about his early life. Most accounts begin with his journalism career. He studied Mass Communication at Al-Aqsa University and later joined Al Jazeera Arabic, reporting on Gaza’s realities under siege.

Following Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel, al-Sharif publicly endorsed the assault. His remarks drew strong criticism from Israeli officials and supporters, who questioned his neutrality, while many Palestinians saw his words as a response to decades of occupation and blockade. In December 2023, an Israeli airstrike targeted al-Sharif but instead killed his father, Jamal, who was unable to evacuate due to poor health. Al-Sharif survived this assassination attempt but continued to work as a journalist under constant threat. On August 10, 2025, Israeli security reportedly used intelligence from his phone to locate him. An airstrike near Al-Shifa Hospital struck a media tent, killing al-Sharif and four other journalists. Al-Sharif’s life and death symbolize the tragic fate of the Palestinian people: railing relentlessly against an enemy they cannot defeat. His death stands as a silent, unheard cry against a force systematically erasing them off the face of the earth.

This post was edited by ferdia on Aug 11 2025 06:54am

Yeah Trump endorses this and wish he could do it here no doubt ...Using the military to clean up homelessness in DC

The claim that he was Hamas does not stick when noting Israeli army officers had over the years instructed him to cease coverage. So supportive of Hamas yes, active member, no. When married with the fact that he was reporting from Gaza, when Israel has made a point of not letting international media report whats going on (mass displacement, mass bombings, mass casualties) it is no wonder that (a) he was killed (b) he knew it was going to happen and (c) Israel would label him hamas. As everyone in gaza is called a hamapalestinian by Israeli's, the label "hamas" has lost a lot of its weight.

Israel recently came out and said that Hamas still had 20,000 men, with only 5,000-10,000 killed since Oct 7th.

This post was edited by ferdia on Aug 11 2025 09:11am

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m17oElr86AM

When they admitted they were working for Mossad?



I sold marijuana in California when I was younger, my small "business" had at least 5 people impersonate my Telegram to scam people. That kind of stuff is childs-play for a shitraeli.


And I absolutely believe you would be excited about a plane crashing into a building in another country. The Talmud tells us exactly what you people believe

This post was edited by kingkawn on Aug 11 2025 03:35pm

There is no record anywhere, FBI file, court transcript, or credible news report of the five men admitting they were Mossad. That’s a made-up line from conspiracy forums, repeated by people who can’t back it up with a single primary source. The FBI interrogated them for weeks, ran polygraphs, and found no evidence of advance knowledge or Mossad employment. They were deported without charges. If you had anything beyond hearsay, you’d post the actual FBI document, but you won’t, because it doesn’t exist. The rest of what you wrote is just recycled antisemitic propaganda that’s been debunked for over a century.



Here’s what one authoritative source laid out:

“none of the Israelis had any information on prior knowledge regarding the bombing of the World Trade Center. Furthermore… none of the Israelis were actively engaged in clandestine intelligence activities in the United States.”

I completely stand behind my answer as I pointed out earlier, plenty of people regardless of background, might react with shock, nervous laughter, or even excitement when witnessing a dramatic, unprecedented event.

Keep smoking 🤦

This post was edited by Many_Names on Aug 11 2025 06:54pm

The rescue of Shlomi Ziv is hard evidence that in Gaza, even people presented to the world as “journalists” and “doctors” can be directly involved in Hamas operations. Ziv was held in the home of Abdallah al-Jamal, described publicly as a journalist, and his father, a doctor. That home was used as a detention site for hostages, which is not journalism, it’s an active role in a war crime.

So spare me with the Anas Al-Sharif BS

Just look at how the BBC frames it:
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c1dxndnkq6yt



The absolute most uncritical, terrorist knob-slobbing framing you can do.
Just evaluate that text on how many words are dedicated to relating factual reporting and how many are framing, suggestion, innuendo, argumentative.

Israel presents their evidence. BBC frames it as "what they've presented as evidence", "appearing", and then making the totally baseless and magical argument that this is "unclear context" and "don't appear to be substantial proof", which they simply pulled out of their own asses. How do they get to make such a determination? That's opining not reporting. Why should Israel draw some distinction about him being Hamas in the past vs present? Is the IDF supposed to split hairs on strike decisions about whether someone might have previously been an enlisted Hamas member but maybe they can't prove he's still currently on their payrolls today? Osama Bin Laden wasn't an active member of Al Qaeda when we got him either, funny that. So the BBC frames that as "No explanation", and "accusations" rather than evidence, and "huge skepticism" from hamas propagandists presented uncritically because that's the side the BBC is allied with.

I care more about the butchery of the truth and BBC printing such obvious propaganda that violates all basic tenets of journalism than the actual story. Imagine being a brit and being forced to fund this trash

Not true, I have Mossad's telegram channel and they even admitted to it. And, I found a piece of paper on the floor the other day that was written by Mossad specifically admitting to it.

Follow the money and you will Understand everything, its all funded propaganda against Israel by Qatar

68% of their funding comes from taxes levied on british television owners, a hearth tax you need to pay to own a TV. Can't watch wallace and gromit if you don't cough up a shilling for the guys who made Doctor Who into Rocky Horror.

Next foreign source was USAID, which Trump rightly axed the fuck out. It wasn't Qataris funding this propaganda, it was democrats