meh, bullchit
just twice? all the other times 'atheist claim to have read the bible they say 3 times cover to cover. its always been 3 times till now. every time i have tested that claim the 'atheist have failed. not failed 80% or 90% or even 98% but 100% of the time. a astonishing 100% of the time. so i dont believe you. maybe you did some kind of speed readding gimmick on it but i wont even believe that.
then you cant give examples of NO free will just because you think its NO free will.................
science has progressed to a point that it has proven a creator. even the 'atheists have had to make this concession. science has been extraordinarily cruel to the 'atheist
just because God know what your going to do doesnt mean you didnt have a choice.
if you were serious about this claim "...can never trust human senses and perceptions..." you would know not to make final conclusions, its simple reasoning. stuff like this is what gets me thinking your a bot. the whole paragraph is bot gibberish. little wonder people who are having conversations with bots are going coocoo.
you chose not to believe. as already been demonstrated with the "alleged" 'atheist conversation. an excuse can always be found. curious, scripture talks of a "leap of faith" ?
your pride makes you protect what you believe. the fundamental difference between a 'atheist is a 'atheist will say "nothing greater than i" while a creationist will say "there is something greater than i" the difference between the two is light years apart. the 'atheist has the highest level of astonishing arrogance. while the creationist stands in humility.
have you ever been wrong about anything? what was it?
"Instinctual Knowledge " your pride is still making you argue this point. i will say it again. your argument isnt with me it with the scientific papers that use the term.
you wont watch videos either because you cant (bot) or your just not serious about collecting information either way it makes you false.............. irreverent babble
I dont care if you believe I read the bible or not.
I never said I can give you an example of no free will, you completely missed the point. I never said I can proof that free will doesnt exist, but you said its obvious that free will exists. Thats why I asked you to prove it if its so obvious or at least oppose my arguments in a serious way.
"just because God know what your going to do doesnt mean you didnt have a choice."
Okay, why does he know it then? Who told him? No one, right?
So if he just knows it, he made it happen. Thats exactly my point. If he didnt aquire the knowledge about what I am going to do he has to be the source. He didnt get the information, he is the original source of the information. Which means he created the thought/action.
I dont know where you get that "Nothing is greater than I" bullahit from when its believers that think humans are the special ones
Nope sorry, still not a scientific term. Not every term is scientific.
This post was edited by Saurod on Jul 14 2025 11:15pm