Don't change what I say to fit your silly argument. I didn't say "The US Government" has unreliable intel, I said Tulsi is an unreliable source.
So if you "didn't say anything about Iran" what were you talking about, then? The subject is Iran and their nukes, what are you talking about, Bhutan? Why are you here? Why are you talking?
I didn't change anything, you can read my posts again, I didn't edit
I am an observer and I was responding to a specific part of your post. You defended an argument by saying "Do you have better intelligence than the US gov?"
My point is that you might be right or you might be wrong, but your appeal to authority (US gov) doesn't prove your point on it's own
Useless debate, the US government says those 3 sites were dedicated to developing weapons, not civilian nuclear power. Do you have better intelligence than the US gov?