Was done in the trial, fox lost billions.
Why is something as trivial as a switch statement, i++, and managing a transaction locked up as closed source proprietary technology by a private equity firm in New York?
Why do government entities allow unvetted, unreviewed 'minor' updates to these systems? (That is how Minnesota law handles it, deep review at adoption, then updates unreviewed. I could change one line of code, call it minor, change an election result)
I'm surprised you'd be for shadow counting in a democracy, that's the risk vector these machines present.
A counting program is literally the first program little children write when they learn foundations of programming lol.
This post was edited by RedFromWinter on Jun 24 2025 05:23am