Little rusty on why exactly, all I remember is was on a letter he wrote. But obviously the project couldn't succeed as a "democratic" one if the majority of the population in the land were the Arabs, even the Arab Jews or Arab Christians.
Because he knew he took their lands even though historically it belongs to the Israelite, but they have been gone for a thousand years (not by choice).
The best way to fully possess it is to get rid of them so they don't need to be kicked around anymore..but of course at the expense of someone else.
It is what it is and I wish both teams the best whether the Palestinians or their surrounding neighbours.
So far, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Iraq has been subjugated.
The next one will be Iran and further down the road , Yemen and Pakistan stretching to the old British Raj.
But Yemen, Pakistan will probably be in the next 50 years or so not so soon.
The control of the Suez and Hormuz straits is too yummy not to try for it.
The lefts fascination with presenting Arabs as a historical victim is so strange to me. They literally spread out of the Arabian peninsula and wiped out at least half a dozen ancient ethnic groups in the middle east and through north Africa in their conquest. You know why a bunch of Jews ended up in eastern Europe, Spain, Armenia, etc? Because Arabs displaced them.
Those that did not get displaced in these places largely ended up extinct and were breed out. Zoroastrians, Berbers, Byzantine Christians, Yazidis.
I mean look at a map guy and try to think how that whole region become overwhelmingly ethnic Arab when before it was much more diverse?
Sorry bro , I disagree with this. This is just partly true.
It is the damn
Romans This post was edited by Hamsterbaby on Jun 20 2025 12:58pm