There are rules in place to remove those people. Your hero is now in charge.
The Pres is ignoring established process.
Eat your hypocrisy with some ignorance

Florida sheriff warns violent protesters, "If you throw a brick... we will kill you"
The sheriff in Brevard County, Florida, had an ominous warning

Yes, the 124th circuit court of the Kansas City BBQ tasting contest filed an injunction, we know

Your side is really pissing a lotta people off with that shit

Your response sounds like a triggered old white man yelling at clouds. And it doesn’t even make sense. You a boomer or just play one on the internet ?

HAHAHAHA REEEEEEEEEEE MAKE MORE REEEEEEEEEEEing NOISES

‘A 40 Point Shift to the Right!’ CNN’s Harry Enten Marvels at Trump and GOP’s ‘Tremendously’ Improved Polling With Immigrants


This post was edited by TiStuff on Jun 13 2025 07:32am

That you think it doesn't make sense speaks volumes about your caliber. I'll help you out, boy. Every breath our president takes gets an injunction from random ass judge of who gives a fuck circuit court. It's judicial overreach that has people convinced that, for example, a BBQ judge can just tell Donald Trump what he can and cannot do and the president must obey and if he doesn't, he's a "tyrant". Just another in a million examples of the Left's "sassy pre teen girl" approach to politics and it alienates the middle, like most of what your team does lately.

hahaha (mew) look at the wussie crying democrats

He Did This To Himself..

Lol you must be really pressed to write that and be ignorant at the same time

Governor's Consent: The U.S. Constitution and the legal authority invoked by the President (Title 10) require the governor's consent for federalization of the National Guard. In this case, Governor Newsom stated he had not given such consent, and he was not provided the opportunity to do so before the deployment.

Thanks for bringing up Title 10. Within it is section 12406 which authorizes the President to take control of the state National Guard for purposes of invasion, rebellion, etc. And it would seem, with millions of illegals, many of whom are waving a foreign flag and making claims to the ceding of American territory to Mexico, that we are the subject of an invasion.

Interesting that, despite the letter of the law which proves you wrong, let's just focus on the spirit/purpose of the law. (which I believe to be more pressing) You believe that the spirit of the law states that a US State has complete autonomy and supreme authority over the country's armed forces, as though he can treat the Ntnl Guardsmen as his own private army. In order for states to function the way you want and dream, seems we'll have to actually have another civil war, and the "states rights" folks will have to win this time. Good luck with that.