d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > General Help > Site Suggestions >
Poll > Pms Per User Shown In 1 Pm.
Prev1345679Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 28,346
Joined: Mar 13 2006
Gold: 450.00
Trader: Trusted
Apr 5 2025 11:08am
I like the idea, could use some ideas with how it looks and how it uses your PM box but I like the premise
Member
Posts: 9,575
Joined: Dec 3 2021
Gold: 38,502.00
May 3 2025 06:00pm
I like the idea, could use some ideas with how it looks and how it uses your PM box but I like the premise


I agree, I just dont have the best gfx skills :D
Anyone seeing this is welcome to help, i could however go to the gfx subforum and ask for help.
Member
Posts: 71,460
Joined: Jun 17 2007
Gold: 1,040.00
May 29 2025 09:51am
Voted yes.
Member
Posts: 73,503
Joined: Aug 14 2007
Gold: 6,940.52
May 29 2025 09:58am
voted no, but only if you're asking for this for free.
if it's paid/monthly, then yes.

there's too much fg out in the wild, would be good to be able to have another gold sink on the site for longevity
Member
Posts: 9,575
Joined: Dec 3 2021
Gold: 38,502.00
May 31 2025 05:08pm
voted no, but only if you're asking for this for free.
if it's paid/monthly, then yes.

there's too much fg out in the wild, would be good to be able to have another gold sink on the site for longevity


In my opinion not really valid, you like the idea but not if its not payed. I think they can deside on that aswell, Its about implementing the idea itself.
Member
Posts: 73,503
Joined: Aug 14 2007
Gold: 6,940.52
May 31 2025 07:35pm
In my opinion not really valid, you like the idea but not if its not payed. I think they can deside on that aswell, Its about implementing the idea itself.


im saying paid/monthly is better than optional/forced because implementing it as free would take away from some of site purchases (for those than "need" 50 more in PM box size). Arguably this would make increased box size moot.

all this to say

in my opinion nOt rEalLy vAliD
Member
Posts: 9,575
Joined: Dec 3 2021
Gold: 38,502.00
May 31 2025 10:50pm
im saying paid/monthly is better than optional/forced because implementing it as free would take away from some of site purchases (for those than "need" 50 more in PM box size). Arguably this would make increased box size moot.

all this to say

in my opinion nOt rEalLy vAliD


Still dont agree with your point, what im saying is:
Your solution to this has not to do with my suggestion, secondly you could also say if my suggestion would be implemented and for free it would make more users use the website and could potentially generate more revenue.
Thats why im telling you, youre point isnt valid, aswell as not looked at in long term thinking.

This post was edited by A1CHI on May 31 2025 10:51pm
Member
Posts: 73,503
Joined: Aug 14 2007
Gold: 6,940.52
May 31 2025 11:35pm
...if my suggestion would be implemented and for free it would make more users use the website and could potentially generate more revenue


if its free the people paying for extra size would stop paying, that's my point
voted no, im not here to argue about if its good/bad (i dont need convos/extra size).

the fact is, this would only apply to paying users given there's already half a solution implemented that is paid (i.e. extra inbox size)
Member
Posts: 9,575
Joined: Dec 3 2021
Gold: 38,502.00
May 31 2025 11:51pm
if its free the people paying for extra size would stop paying, that's my point
voted no, im not here to argue about if its good/bad (i dont need convos/extra size).

the fact is, this would only apply to paying users given there's already half a solution implemented that is paid (i.e. extra inbox size)


Its not about extra size, read carefully
Member
Posts: 9,575
Joined: Dec 3 2021
Gold: 38,502.00
Jun 19 2025 03:41am
good moment to bump it up.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Topic List
Prev1345679Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll