d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Why Does Maga Blatantly Ignore Facts?
Prev167891011Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 46,832
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 8 2025 10:03am
Why would anyone care if he posted it or anyone else? Its a fun image, stop the "offended" madness. Please.


hey? that booga wooga christian still after your job?
Member
Posts: 19,152
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
May 8 2025 10:25am
Why would anyone care if he posted it or anyone else? Its a fun image, stop the "offended" madness. Please.


People just can't take a joke.

Trump is obviously not serious about being Pope, lol.
Member
Posts: 19,213
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
May 8 2025 10:27am
its the Trump Derangement Syndrome, look at my sig
Member
Posts: 9,004
Joined: Mar 15 2008
Gold: 2,150.00
May 8 2025 10:38am
People just can't take a joke.

Trump is obviously not serious about being Pope, lol.


I'm sure it was taken the same way as all those who defended the opening ceremony heresy from the Paris Olympics. Yeah, call a spade a spade. All those peeps defended that terrible depiction of whatever the crap that was, but this guy posts a meme that is actually funny and relevant to the current events. And the pant crapping commences..... LOL! We have children, and then we have the Right and Moderates, it seems.

But because it represents something that stands for family values and not sex/LGBTQ/race, the left sees it as something SOOOOOOOOOOOOO egregious. I say thanks to those people, and so does Shiloh Hendricks, because the whining over double standards is kinda old and people are tired of the "black fatigue" attitude.

How can a non-white, opposite of Caucasian person say they own a word (the "N" word) but be so controlled by it? It seems the thing in control owns them...
Member
Posts: 7,251
Joined: Oct 9 2021
Gold: 4,661.71
May 8 2025 10:45am
hey? that booga wooga christian still after your job?


I dont know if thats related to the incident with me, but he went on a very weird, sudden vacation almost 3 weeks ago and is scheduled to come back on monday. Nothing new here so far.
Member
Posts: 26,719
Joined: Apr 18 2007
Gold: 1,246.69
May 8 2025 11:58am
Quite the opposite lol

Most leftist “fact checks” Usually start with “Although mostly true…” then proceeds to say something like “the article said it happened on February 12th but it actually happened on February 12th at 12:15 PM” and liberals will scream that the whole article is bunked because it didn’t specify the time, even though everything in the article is factual
Member
Posts: 19,152
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
May 8 2025 02:10pm
Quite the opposite lol

Most leftist “fact checks” Usually start with “Although mostly true…” then proceeds to say something like “the article said it happened on February 12th but it actually happened on February 12th at 12:15 PM” and liberals will scream that the whole article is bunked because it didn’t specify the time, even though everything in the article is factual


:rofl: yep
Member
Posts: 40,247
Joined: Feb 14 2007
Gold: 5,737.99
May 8 2025 02:43pm
Quite the opposite lol

Most leftist “fact checks” Usually start with “Although mostly true…” then proceeds to say something like “the article said it happened on February 12th but it actually happened on February 12th at 12:15 PM” and liberals will scream that the whole article is bunked because it didn’t specify the time, even though everything in the article is factual


Like when CNN had a reporter standing in front of a building engulfed in flames but had a chyron that read: 'FIERY BUT MOSTLY PEACEFUL PROTESTS AFTER POLICE SHOOTING.'

Member
Posts: 39,003
Joined: Jan 11 2006
Gold: 5,009.35
May 8 2025 02:50pm
Quite the opposite lol

Most leftist “fact checks” Usually start with “Although mostly true…” then proceeds to say something like “the article said it happened on February 12th but it actually happened on February 12th at 12:15 PM” and liberals will scream that the whole article is bunked because it didn’t specify the time, even though everything in the article is factual


Bingo.

"Very fine people" is another one.

That "gotcha" journalism worked for a while but after doing it so long people don't even watch/trust the msm anymore.
Member
Posts: 50,697
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
May 8 2025 03:11pm
"Without evidence" is the most conspicuous one

You can blatantly lie in mainstream media reports right on NPR or CBS evening news or whatever and say Trump or any other republican made a claim "without evidence" even if the very next sentence is you describing the evidence they presented.
Sometimes the claims are true, sometimes they are false. For example, claiming Ilhan Omar married her brother, without evidence. I mean, we have the marriage certificate, apartment lease, archived social media accounts, police reports from incidents at the residence, her tax filings, photos of them together and timestamped comments where they refer to each other as family members (him as uncle to her children), and a photo where his medical tag is visible in a hospital with his name and birthdate matching the marriage certificate. Their father's Somali language eulogy that openly and publicly acknowledged Ahmed Nur Said Elmi to be his son and Ilhan his daughter. Photos of the family together young, and of them on vacation together. Statements from Somali community members and the whistleblower she tried to have suppressed during her campaign. So basically, the biggest pile of irrefutable evidence possible short of a DNA test (which we also supposedly got, but source made it 'questionable')
https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-ilhan-omar-was-not-arrested-23-times-and-other-inaccuracies-in-meme-idUSKBN2AJ2BG/
Quote
In a previous article ( here ), Reuters addressed allegations, made without evidence, that Omar married her brother to help him gain American citizenship. In 2016, Omar issued a statement in which she clarified the timeline of her marital history and called the rumors “baseless”, “false and ridiculous.” ( here )
As reported by Business Insider here , there is no hard evidence that Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, who she legally married in 2009 based on her statement, ( here ) is her brother or that Omar committed fraud.


I mean, Reuters can just lie to you like that. There is no hard evidence, besides the pile of official documentation and verifiable archived media and voluminous tome labeled "hard evidence Ilhan Omar married her own brother"
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev167891011Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll