you took 3 days working on your weasel words and the best you got is mRNA isnt genetics.................

a prediction i made years ago
TiStuff

Member
Posts: 41,006
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Quote#22
Nov 6 2020 06:59pm
Quote (DALTONG @ Oct 30 2020 05:47am)
Covid is fake

It's a scam / hoax

It's all political and about the economy


and if the left gets away with the voter fraud they will mandate by force you slap a rag on your face and larp along

lol, damn, mad because I did not instantly reply. Maybe life happened or something. Some people work.
Anyway, you seem to have skipped just about everything of what I said, so I'll just copy paste my previous post.

I don't understand your inquiry. We've used viral vectors in vaccines plenty of times. Are you against mRNA vaccines, or anything that involves genes?
If your problem is with mRNA, mRNA does not reach the definition of "genetics" and therefore you do not have a problem with it.
If your problem is with integrating foreign genetic material into our own genetic material (which requires entry to the nucleus, not just the cell) -- then you must clearly also be against every viral vector stemmed vaccine and a strong opponent of crispr-cas9 technology. I can see the problem with the viral vectors, but you'll have to help me understand your problem with crispr-cas9.

Kindly stay on the subject of mRNA vaccines and your problem with it. Argue why it is or is not "genetics", explain whether or not this is where you have a problem or whether it has to do with integrating foreign genetic material - and if so, kindly elaborate where you draw the line. Don't go running back to covid mask usage. Nothing to do with the last few posts, nothing at all.

lol gtfo
you know what would be fun? if you explain to everyone how the covid19 mRNA jab supposed to work

This post was edited by TiStuff on May 5 2025 03:26am

See post 519. I am asking for clarification on your end so that I can answer the question that you provided.
Is even this, too difficult for you?

If answer is anything unrelated to post 519, I'm stepping out. I am not here to give screaming kids their popsicle, I don't reward screaming with attention. You argued that I must be impossible to discuss anything with irl. This is the one time I ask you to follow-up on your own input, one single god-damn time. Make it worthwhile. Show that for one f***ing time you are able to advance beyond the first square of the discussion boardgame. Use arguments, share your ideas. Do not divert. It is not difficult. You've 10+ post-school years experience of research and discussing things with people according to your own words, I have a reasonable expectancy based on this claim. Do not disappoint.

This post was edited by Leeevee on May 5 2025 06:12am

dude..................you already stepped out when you made this comment

Quote

If your problem is with mRNA, mRNA does not reach the definition of "genetics"

This post was edited by TiStuff on May 5 2025 07:15am

Okay. So discuss with me, why you think that that particular comment means that "I have stepped out".
Look, I am honestly giving you a huge opportunity to learn how to converse with people. Try it ._.

because mRNA is genetics...................


only lefties would think forcing everyone to wear a codpiece on their face would be cool

I will disregard the last comment, because it has 0% to do with our thread.
Please define "genetics", because we clearly have a disagreement there. Kindly refer to a reasonable source when you reference where you have gotten your definition from.

We're getting somewhere, keep trying and try not to stray.

its not our thread..............

why dont you give me a source were mRNA isnt genetics