d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Pard Needs Some Christian Content
Prev1192021222349Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 22,432
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 106.11
May 2 2025 02:31pm
This post is a violation of the site rules and appropriate action was taken.

as soon as they get out of the gender neutral bathroom you'll be packing your bags.


Personally, I am against gender neutral bathrooms because I think it much more preferable to have a communal bathroom with urinals next to one another like we usually do so I can pee alongside other men and glance at their cocks. I was previously misguided in my earlier years, thinking that gender neutral / single-stall bathrooms were ideal, but I think the conservatives are actually right on this one.

This post was edited by Handcuffs on May 2 2025 02:31pm
Member
Posts: 17,571
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
May 2 2025 04:50pm
I bet its some divine wisdom secret message written by toothless goat herders 1000 years ago.

this one very cool too:

Deuteronomy 22:28-29

If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.


What I love about the Bible is how so many people take Bible passages at face value without ever any further investigation.

Let's do a test to gauge where you are at. Take the following Bible verse and tell me why it would say something like that last statement, how can that possibly be?

2 Corinthians 12:10: "That is why, for Christ’s sake, I delight in weaknesses, in insults, in hardships, in persecutions, in difficulties. For when I am weak, then I am strong."
Member
Posts: 34,824
Joined: May 16 2024
Gold: 0.00
May 2 2025 05:00pm
What I love about the Bible is how so many people take Bible passages at face value without ever any further investigation.

Let's do a test to gauge where you are at. Take the following Bible verse and tell me why it would say something like that last statement, how can that possibly be?

2 Corinthians 12:10: "That is why, for Christ’s sake, I delight in weaknesses, in insults, in hardships, in persecutions, in difficulties. For when I am weak, then I am strong."


haha ya typical naive attitude "Everything i like and agree with in the bible that can be applied to modern times ethics/laws is cold unbendable truth, but all the savagery, genetial mutilations rapes, killings etc is just another form of poetry that should never be taken at face value" :lol:
Member
Posts: 46,833
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 2 2025 05:08pm
haha ya typical naive attitude "Everything i like and agree with in the bible that can be applied to modern times ethics/laws is cold unbendable truth, but all the savagery, genetial mutilations rapes, killings etc is just another form of poetry that should never be taken at face value" :lol:


a lot of scripture are merely historical documents. when i first started studying scripture i was surprised christians dont know how to teach the bible. imo

the bulk of the old testament is a bout God working with a difficult people.
much of it documents mans fallen condition
new testament main part of the show is his reason and his teaching.

so ya. "...but all the savagery, genetial mutilations rapes, killings etc ..." the bible is a story about mankind.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

genital mutilations? you mean circumcision? i remember years ago when i was on you tube the arguments that would literally pour out on this topic. they would rage n rage how horrible a practice it was. and they would lie calling it "lopping of a penis". i would remind them it was merely a flap of skin and on top of that it was a jewish practice. now the weird, part the transing of childing and these same people are screaming for the actual lopping off of body parts

hard to believe the brutality of the left. if they cant get them in the womb they go after them in the schools

This post was edited by TiStuff on May 2 2025 05:15pm
Member
Posts: 34,824
Joined: May 16 2024
Gold: 0.00
May 2 2025 05:27pm
a lot of scripture are merely historical documents. when i first started studying scripture i was surprised christians dont know how to teach the bible. imo

the bulk of the old testament is a bout God working with a difficult people.
much of it documents mans fallen condition
new testament main part of the show is his reason and his teaching.

so ya. "...but all the savagery, genetial mutilations rapes, killings etc ..." the bible is a story about mankind.


bruh its not a story nor does bible hold any historical value, people who wrote parts of the bible actually felt and at the time obviously believed what they where writing is some hot wise shit, then people who redacted it like 1000 times kept modernizing it as ethics/laws changed but at a certain point they stopped redacting it cause ordinary Joe would ask uncomfortable questions about things he got used to if they got changed to suit the current agenda at the time and now he owned a book himself to prove it. parts of it remained, thats why we got "Treat your neighbor as you would like to be treated on page 66" and "Cut off his genitals, crush his babies skull with your sandals, and rape his wife so she gives you strong kin through mix of your and your enemies blood" on page 67.

Abrahamic religions are the worst bs ever introduced to mankind, however I do acknowledge that at times and often long periods of time it helped unite people and preserve the progress of certain group, but its only because the other mob was claiming their version of same God just told them to rape and pillage everything on their path. People will find a way to believe a man on the cloud, wild magical crap, gods son who is also his own father and was born through angelic sperm transfer to a virgin, if it helps them satisfy their animalistic instinct to kill. Luckily as we move away from our monkey roots, these instincts are being dull'd more and more.
Member
Posts: 46,833
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 2 2025 08:02pm
bruh its not a story nor does bible hold any historical value, people who wrote parts of the bible actually felt and at the time obviously believed what they where writing is some hot wise shit, then people who redacted it like 1000 times kept modernizing it as ethics/laws changed but at a certain point they stopped redacting it cause ordinary Joe would ask uncomfortable questions about things he got used to if they got changed to suit the current agenda at the time and now he owned a book himself to prove it. parts of it remained, thats why we got "Treat your neighbor as you would like to be treated on page 66" and "Cut off his genitals, crush his babies skull with your sandals, and rape his wife so she gives you strong kin through mix of your and your enemies blood" on page 67.

Abrahamic religions are the worst bs ever introduced to mankind, however I do acknowledge that at times and often long periods of time it helped unite people and preserve the progress of certain group, but its only because the other mob was claiming their version of same God just told them to rape and pillage everything on their path. People will find a way to believe a man on the cloud, wild magical crap, gods son who is also his own father and was born through angelic sperm transfer to a virgin, if it helps them satisfy their animalistic instinct to kill. Luckily as we move away from our monkey roots, these instincts are being dull'd more and more.


bruh, all kinds of people making up history. you posting your imaginary version isnt a new thing
as far as mere historical value is concerned its not uncommon for archaeologists to use scripture to make discoveries

and your wrong about the worst thing. 'atheism has done the most boasting. the results are now recorded. nothing in the whole of world history has brought more misery than 'atheism- were man is god.
Atheist Governments of the 20th Century: The Death Toll of Godless Goodness
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/publiccatholic/2013/03/atheist-governments-of-the-20th-century-the-death-toll-of-godless-goodness/

Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50) 49-78,000,00 people murdered

Jozef Stalin (USSR 1932-39 only) 15,000,000 people murdered

Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79) 1,700,000 people murdered

Kim II Sung (North Korea 1948-94) 1.6 million people murdered

Tito (Yugoslavia 1945-1987) 570,000 people murdered

Suharto (Communists 1967-66) 500,000 people murdered

Ante Pavelic (Croatia 1941-45) 359,000 people murdered

Ho Chi Min (Vietnam 1953-56) 200,000 people murdered

Vladimir Ilich Lenin (USSR, 1917-20) 30,000 people murdered

Adolf Hitler (Germany 1939-1945) 12,000,000 people murdered

This post was edited by TiStuff on May 2 2025 08:08pm
Member
Posts: 17,571
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
May 2 2025 08:26pm
haha ya typical naive attitude "Everything i like and agree with in the bible that can be applied to modern times ethics/laws is cold unbendable truth, but all the savagery, genetial mutilations rapes, killings etc is just another form of poetry that should never be taken at face value" :lol:


Thank you for proving my point that you are one of those people who refuse to listen or to do any deeper research.

This is exactly what I'm talking about, people like you will take a small snippet, maybe out of context if you can, then we who do study Scripture will go and do what you should have done at the beginning. It's happened every single time and this time is no different.

It would be a hopeless cause to try and explain that passage from 2 Kings to you. You couldn't even start with 2 Corinthians.
Member
Posts: 34,824
Joined: May 16 2024
Gold: 0.00
May 3 2025 02:15am
Thank you for proving my point that you are one of those people who refuse to listen or to do any deeper research.

This is exactly what I'm talking about, people like you will take a small snippet, maybe out of context if you can, then we who do study Scripture will go and do what you should have done at the beginning. It's happened every single time and this time is no different.

It would be a hopeless cause to try and explain that passage from 2 Kings to you. You couldn't even start with 2 Corinthians.


Bruh I dont study fairytales.

bruh, all kinds of people making up history. you posting your imaginary version isnt a new thing
as far as mere historical value is concerned its not uncommon for archaeologists to use scripture to make discoveries

and your wrong about the worst thing. 'atheism has done the most boasting. the results are now recorded. nothing in the whole of world history has brought more misery than 'atheism- were man is god.
Atheist Governments of the 20th Century: The Death Toll of Godless Goodness
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/publiccatholic/2013/03/atheist-governments-of-the-20th-century-the-death-toll-of-godless-goodness/

Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50) 49-78,000,00 people murdered

Jozef Stalin (USSR 1932-39 only) 15,000,000 people murdered

Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79) 1,700,000 people murdered

Kim II Sung (North Korea 1948-94) 1.6 million people murdered

Tito (Yugoslavia 1945-1987) 570,000 people murdered

Suharto (Communists 1967-66) 500,000 people murdered

Ante Pavelic (Croatia 1941-45) 359,000 people murdered

Ho Chi Min (Vietnam 1953-56) 200,000 people murdered

Vladimir Ilich Lenin (USSR, 1917-20) 30,000 people murdered

Adolf Hitler (Germany 1939-1945) 12,000,000 people murdered


In public speeches prior to and in the early years of his rule, he described himself as a Christian. Hitler and the Nazi party promoted Positive Christianity, which rejected most traditional Christian doctrines such as the divinity of Jesus, as well as Jewish elements such as the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible).

looks like Hitler wasn't atheist, but you could come up with similar lists for other religions throughout history, them being atheist/religious/agnostic/pagan is circumstantial

This post was edited by Fnall on May 3 2025 02:38am
Member
Posts: 46,833
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 3 2025 03:24am
Bruh I dont study fairytales.



In public speeches prior to and in the early years of his rule, he described himself as a Christian. Hitler and the Nazi party promoted Positive Christianity, which rejected most traditional Christian doctrines such as the divinity of Jesus, as well as Jewish elements such as the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible).

looks like Hitler wasn't atheist, but you could come up with similar lists for other religions throughout history, them being atheist/religious/agnostic/pagan is circumstantial


ya, hitler was a liar, a bad argument for anything
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

so funny has to be posted :D


This post was edited by TiStuff on May 3 2025 03:25am
Member
Posts: 17,571
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
May 3 2025 05:04pm
Bruh I dont study fairytales.


Then why are you here? Why do you try to give your input on something you know very little about?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1192021222349Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll