what a load of chit yup yup you really whooped azz way back in lala land.
ya you didnt know what the NIH was is baffling.
i posted dr fraudies and his wifes curious employment and their curious super duper increase in wealth during the covid scam.
biching about "bolds and fonts" is just biching, and its unique to you.
i imagine how you 'argue in real life is you get longwinded and real loud ............
just so one of us is on topic here is a reference makes covidiots look like ...........well???? idiots
What Part Of This Graph Isn't Clear?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knBC0KPcTPwSee, there's the reason why I usually hop off conversation train with you m8. I've given you those articles back then. Now you just simply deny it. I know just fine what the NIH is, and have given you zero foundation to think otherwise, but now you're repeating it like a parrot. In truth, I was asking you if that is what you meant with a reference, and after that, you started attacking me for not knowing what a reference is -- something you have proven to lack the recognition of. Now you're going on about Fauci and his wife -- again -- which is quite beside the point during our conversation. When you kept hammering on the wife's financials, I read a little about it, came back to discuss it and you just jumped subjects instead of continuing the conversation on a topic you yourself have provided. Furthermore, you say I'm b*tching about bolds and fonts. I don't care about them, it's just rather needless and quite frankly rude, and apparently is what you seem to consider as being a reference, because everytime I asked you about references you just use an even bigger front trying to point me to that direction. Which is still not a reference, but alas.
The graph is one thing, and as always, shown per a youtube video. Everyone capable of making a YT video is able to upload any information available. This is not representative of epidemiological data, unless so referenced in this video (I didn't bother to look at it, seeing as you tend to only use biased sources for your information seeking, such as when you used that swiss "government" report on one of the vaccins some years back). I have given you the epidemiological data on the usefulness of interventions during the Pandemic, and what the goal of these interventions were -- and what they weren't. Surprising absolutely nobody, I remember that you proceeded to dismiss the information I had given you by jumping subjects mid-conversation, just as you've been doing now.
I don't know about how I sound in arguments in real life. My supervisors tell me I can be strong of opinion during staff meetings when we discuss patients, but I am also the resident they tend to send to the people who require, let's say, the soft and time-consuming approach. But you can picture me however you like. I know I'm picturing you with one of those cartoon-sized maga hats
/e typo
This post was edited by Leeevee on Apr 25 2025 10:26am