Arguments from incredulity.
No documentation of the plans, blue prints, or documents of carrying out mass execution of Jews in Nazi Germany was ever found, an unheard of feat, all you have is hearsay of a couple Nazi officials having their families threatened forced into signing a premade document presented by the allies, some of which were allowed to live free which is probably the deal Hans Frank thought he was getting.
...
Quote (Grok)
Yes, there are documents from Nazi Germany that demonstrate the intent to carry out the Final Solution, the systematic genocide of Jews and other groups during the Holocaust. Below are key examples of such evidence, based on historical records:
Wannsee Conference Protocol (January 20, 1942):
The most explicit document outlining the Final Solution is the protocol from the Wannsee Conference, held in Berlin. Chaired by Reinhard Heydrich and attended by senior Nazi officials, including Adolf Eichmann, the meeting discussed the "Final Solution to the Jewish Question." The protocol, drafted by Eichmann, details plans for the deportation and extermination of European Jews. While it uses euphemisms like "evacuation" and "resettlement," it clearly refers to mass murder, stating that 11 million Jews were targeted for these measures. The document specifies logistical coordination across occupied territories and estimates Jewish populations in various countries.
Einsatzgruppen Reports:
The Einsatzgruppen, mobile killing squads, operated in Eastern Europe, particularly after the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Their reports, sent to Berlin, meticulously recorded the mass shootings of Jews, Roma, and others. For example, the "Jäger Report" (December 1941) by Einsatzkommando 3 commander Karl Jäger details the execution of 137,346 people, mostly Jews, in Lithuania. These reports show the scale and deliberate nature of the killings, aligning with the broader genocidal policy.
Himmler’s Posen Speeches (October 4 and 6, 1943):
Heinrich Himmler, head of the SS, gave speeches to senior SS officers in Posen (now Poznań, Poland), explicitly referring to the extermination of Jews as a secret task. He described the "evacuation of the Jews" as their "extermination" and a "never-to-be-written page of glory" in Nazi history. These speeches were recorded and transcribed, providing direct evidence of high-level intent.
Correspondence and Orders:
Various Nazi communications confirm the genocidal policy. For instance, Himmler’s orders to the SS and communications with camp commandants, such as Rudolf Höss of Auschwitz, reference the use of gas chambers and crematoria for mass killings. A 1943 letter from SS officer Wilhelm Koppe discusses the "special treatment" (Sonderbehandlung), a code for execution, of Jews in the Warthegau region.
Auschwitz Blueprints and Construction Documents:
Architectural plans and construction records for Auschwitz-Birkenau, including designs for gas chambers and crematoria, indicate the infrastructure built for mass extermination. These documents, found in Nazi archives, show modifications to camps specifically for industrialized killing.
Goebbels’ Diaries:
Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister, wrote in his diary on March 27, 1942, about the "liquidation" of Jews, noting that "not much will remain of the Jews" and that the process was being carried out with "no sentimentality." His entries reflect awareness and approval of the extermination policy at the highest levels.
These documents, among others, were used as evidence during the Nuremberg Trials (1945–1946), where Nazi leaders were prosecuted for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Historians have cross-referenced them with survivor testimonies, archaeological evidence, and postwar confessions (e.g., Eichmann’s trial in 1961) to confirm their authenticity and the deliberate intent behind the Final Solution. The Nazis often used coded language to obscure their actions, but the cumulative evidence leaves no doubt about their genocidal objectives.
Meanwhile this past month in congress we have heard testimony from Jewish Organizations that the United States of America needs to curtail the 1st amendment to protect Jewish policy interests moving forward.
That's something I am sure you support 100%, given how you recoil at being called out.
I'd say something so retarded had never been vomited onto a page, but... well... I've been through these discussions before. If you think telling you to go make your own thread is "curtailing the 1st amendment," you definitely fit the description.
Remember that old line about you can't reason people out of positions they didn't reason themselves into?
I see the same shit in the media today, some talking head will unironically say "...and Trump claimed, without evidence, that blah blah blah, and the only evidence he presented to support his position is blah blah blah". Saw exactly that on a Colbert broadcast a couple weeks ago and I saw him pause midsentence for a fraction of a second, I don't think the audience or viewers even notice. There's no evidence of the most heavily documented extermination campaign in history, besides all the evidence.
Nobody is going to arrive at being a holocaust denying antisemite in 2025 unless they're totally divorced from critical thinking and reason, so there's really no point to engaging on it. If I come along the road and see someone eating a big turd sandwich I'm not going to debate with them on the basics of hygiene and sanitation and the well founded evolutionary biological anathema we hold against coprophagia. Someone who is eating shit clearly has a few screws loose and didn't just misjudge their afternoon tea and biscuits.
Double 360 no scoped.