“If you would’ve asked me a year ago, I would’ve said there’s no way in hell!” #WalkAway Testimonial
“What really did it for me was realizing how freaking depressed I was when I was a liberal. Liberalism will make you hate yourself, hate your family, hate your friends, hate everything about the world…A lot of us are leaving the party in droves because you guys have made it impossible to have any sort of individual thought whatsoever.”

Ah, you know, I mainly know you from our discussion about the sense and nonsense of interventions during the pandemic, and your one sole means of 'evidence' was bitchute, of which I estimate you posted about 60 videos during our talks.
From my perspective, you leaped towards youtube, but perhaps you're right and you've had a gradual process. Good for you.

Who do you think will be the blue candidate in '28 going up against Trump? They should stop pitting him against women fr though lol

at the time youtube was heavily into cancel culture and controlling the narrative. i myself was canceled off you tube because i merely questioned the 2020 election.
under stand your disdain for bitchute isnt any kind of metric at all for determining the content of any bitchute video or anything else.

have no idea what 2028 going to bring. i dont write the script

It's true, it's not a metic at all. But you're asking me to compare my q1 medical journals lying around at work with Donald Duck comic strips' level of content, so to speak. It's not a metric. But the platform on which information is released may be somewhat suggestive.

you dont make any arguments other than assertion fallacy "its what i say it is cause i say it" "muh q1 medical journals - i label your stuff donald duck"
this kinda of stuff is garbage and easily dismissed.

i suggest you take one of those q1 medical journal articles and actually reference it and school me on something.
since it doesnt really seem to be a trump topic go make a new thread and get off this one

This post was edited by TiStuff on Apr 20 2025 12:38pm

I'll refer to our discussion about face masks, where I have given you ample number of studies to support my case against your bitchute series.
You're accusing me of not doing something that I have done, in excessive amounts no less.

When I went on to ask something on-topic, you dismissed it to continue this off-topic conversation. Practice what you preach :>

your obviously just here to troll the trump thread. last nail in the coffin for masks was the cochran study. when dr fraudie was asked about it in the stupid voice and gawky facial expression he always has he said "maybe it (masks) dont work on a societal level but it works on a individual level. lol that was on CNN of all places and the dude was looking at fraudie like he was town idiot
the only reason leftie kooks started wearing masks is because trump took his off. the left obsession with face diapers and harassing ev1 else is probably why trump is so popular

TRUMP SUPER POPULAR SUPER KOOK FACE DIAPER LEFTIES SEALD THAT DEAL
its funny though? lefties get mad at me. leave me alone diaper faces its your fault deal with it. get your head out of your diaper

your mask kookery claims would be more on topic in this thread. so lets move over there, k? or i will have to start to report your trolling
Post Your Favorite Covid Pandemic Moments
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=101458731&f=119

This post was edited by TiStuff on Apr 21 2025 10:27am

Defending chin diapers in 2025 is some next level tribalism

Nah mate, denying it is some next level tribalism. Who uses the term "chin diapers" anyway, are you 12? lol
Given your sheer aptitude for scientific research, I will pay you the compliment of assuming you can read and comprehend the article below, which took all of 40 seconds to find without logging in to my licenses.

Tabatabaeizadeh SA. Airborne transmission of COVID-19 and the role of face mask to prevent it: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2021 Jan 2;26(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40001-020-00475-6. PMID: 33388089; PMCID: PMC7776300.

One major caveat is that a ton of studies only verified the effectiveness of masks under lab conditions, while empirical data showed their impact in real world settings to be magnitudes smaller.
Yes, masks were very effective if they fit the individual's face well, never got touched with unwashed hands and got changed for a fresh mask as soon as they became even a little bit wet or sweaty.