You have to do that before you kill the people, how is that not clear to you?

A clear majority of Americans don't want illegals in the country. It's not controversial. Trump was democratically elected on a mandate to remove illegals from the country. Judges are unelected.

Trump should change the law through congress and deport them that way. But he probably also made a reasonable assertion that it would take years to do that, and in the space of 4 years it would be impossible to go through the entire legal process AND deport a good chunk of illegals.

What source are you looking at that is proving he is decreased?

If the government is 100% convinced he is a terrorist I'll be curious to see the evidence.

If no evidence arises then yes, everything that has occurred would be an issue.

Your thread is very premature as you don't have any evidence to go towards any of your claims.

You don't know for sure if he is alive or dead.
You also don't know for sure if he is a terrorist or not.

We all will in fact, find out. So we should all just watch patiently as it unravels.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia is not an American name.

This post was edited by zorzin on Apr 14 2025 02:50pm

We do know his last status was "protected from deportation"? That is so obvious even the white house did not try to sweep it under the rug and instead admitted the error.

You should not wait patiently if your president defies the judicial and legislative branch, unless you are happy to live in a dictatorship.

While I do not for sure know if he is dead already, given the information now he is not comming back. If he comes back unharmed, the screw up was much less severe than straight up killing him but it then still happened and there still needs to be consequences.

I want to reiterate: it does not matter if he turns out to be a terrorist or not in the future. You need to follow the laws, even if you personally think somebody deserved what they got. When they deported him all he was was "protected from deportation".

they came for the j6ers and fraud lefties didnt say chit

We don't negotiate with terrorists.

If he is a terrorist I'm 100% fine with the immediate removal of him from the country.

Again, your thread is premature as you don't have any facts to back any of your claims right now other than the fact he was deported as a legal citizen of Maryland.

If he turns out to not be a terrorist I will not be okay with the steps taken, but I'll have faith that they have concrete evidence that he is affiliated with the gang.

The party you are behind are the reasons why our state of illegal immigration is the way it is. So I'm okay with a firm and efficient process taking place for illegals and terrorists.

This post was edited by D_urRRR on Apr 14 2025 02:59pm

I am german, the party I am behind is probably less pro immigration than democrats are. But what they do is follow the law to a T, we learned the hard way what happens if one person decides who gets deported 90 years ago.

You need to have the law on your side before you act, that is just how time works. You can't deport people (very likely killing them).and then later decide if it was right by law, that is absolutely insane.

there it is its the "muh racism" card what this thread is really about

Idk why you feel the need for the government to cater to your need of media attention prior to them acting upon a terrorist. It's almost as of you'd rather see the news say, "we have evidence that Kilmar Abrego Garcia is a terrorist with the gang ms-13 so now that you are aware of that fact we will now go and pick him up". Which would be stupid for them to show the world their evidence first before acting on it.

Again, you do not know for sure if he is a terrorist or not and if he is it's literally disgusting you care more about them taking a process rather doing what's best for the safety of our country and its citizens.