d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Boss Is Concerned
Prev11011121314Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 47,163
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Apr 12 2025 05:48am
Proselytizing means to convert. I said to flip his logic against him so he backs off. There is nothing there about converting him so that's 1 lie Secondly I didn't mention Christianity in that post I just said religious people. So that's a second lie. I am not obsessed I talk about plenty of subjects besides religion. Obsessed would be talking about it and nothing else which is a 3rd lie.

3 lies in one post tistuff you are really showing us.


going after christianity is your passion, everyone here can see that.
Member
Posts: 30,984
Joined: Mar 24 2019
Gold: 30.00
Warn: 10%
Apr 12 2025 08:10am
going after christianity is your passion, everyone here can see that.


:angel:
Member
Posts: 12,343
Joined: Jul 22 2007
Gold: 84.67
Warn: 10%
Apr 12 2025 08:31am
Why do you think it’s a joke?


There are a lot of theories by people smarter than you about living in a simulation or our brains could be in a glass jar or some shit like that man


Elon musk… one of the smartest most successful people of our generation believes in simulation theory


:rofl:
Member
Posts: 16,205
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Apr 12 2025 01:47pm
going after christianity is your passion, everyone here can see that.


What you have just done is used a motte-and-bailey fallacy. You first presented the Bailey: you trying to convert others, you obsessed and only focusing on Christianity
Then when you got owned logically retreated to a more easily defendable general position motte: your passion is going after muh Christianity...

You can add it to 3-4 fallacies you seem to know.

You are welcome
Member
Posts: 47,163
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Apr 12 2025 02:32pm
What you have just done is used a motte-and-bailey fallacy. You first presented the Bailey: you trying to convert others, you obsessed and only focusing on Christianity
Then when you got owned logically retreated to a more easily defendable general position motte: your passion is going after muh Christianity...

You can add it to 3-4 fallacies you seem to know.

You are welcome


i said only? i have to call you out on that
Member
Posts: 16,205
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Apr 12 2025 02:37pm
i said only? i have to call you out on that


I was paraphrasing you basically said Christian 3 times in one line with big emphasis on Christianity

Hope that helps
Member
Posts: 19,225
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
Apr 12 2025 02:45pm
I was paraphrasing you basically said Christian 3 times in one line with big emphasis on Christianity

Hope that helps


It's funny seeing you get 5-0'd by 100% of the gc population.
Member
Posts: 16,205
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Apr 12 2025 03:04pm
It's funny seeing me get 5-0'd by 100% of the gc population.


See I can make empty statements that don't reflect reality also. You have to be able demonstrate that they do first.

Admitting being wrong takes humility and critical self analysis. It's difficult. Following people around and spite posting while denying that you've lost.. well that's cowardly.

Anyway are you planning to follow me around like TiStuff my #1 cheerleader?
Member
Posts: 47,163
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Apr 12 2025 03:12pm
I was paraphrasing you basically said Christian 3 times in one line with big emphasis on Christianity

Hope that helps


ok there isnt a only
Member
Posts: 16,205
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Apr 12 2025 03:41pm
ok there isnt a only


That's what paraphrasing is, you made strong emphasis on Christianity without a disclaimer.

Ah yes the famous ignore the main issue, but let's instead split hairs on an implied word you didn't technically say. Good one

You might recall this as red herring fallacy. Boy you are on a roll.


Ignore Main Focus
Focusing on minor points while ignoring the main argument is a logical fallacy known as the red herring or the fallacy of the irrelevant conclusion. This fallacy occurs when someone diverts attention from the main issue by introducing a side issue, thus shifting the focus away from the central point of the argument.

For example, in a discussion about climate change policies, someone might bring up a minor detail about a scientist's personal life instead of addressing the evidence presented about climate change.

This fallacy can also be seen as a form of "logic chopping" or "nit-picking," where trivial details of an argument are focused on rather than the main point.

In summary, when someone argues a minor point and ignores the main argument, they are committing a logical fallacy that can be referred to as a red herring, irrelevant conclusion, or logic chopping.
Go Back To General Chat Topic List
Prev11011121314Next
Closed New Topic New Poll