If you look at the graph, Trump was spending a lot even before COVID. Biden also spent a lot, but he also didn't run on "I will reduce spending" and instead you had the best COVID recovery of all western countries.
Also the other candidate was Harris, not Biden. Not that it really matters anymore.
For the bold part: I mean yes, that's just how it was globally. You can sacrifice some old people (like e.g. Sweden did) or sacrifice part of your economy and some of your and your childrens wellbeing - there was a tradeoff, the rhetoric is right. The decision arguably wasn't, although I personally am happy to still have three living grandparents.
Trump wasn't doing a good job on the deficit during his first term, but he at least had strong growth to show for it. At the end of the day, it's about debt to GDP ratio, rather than the raw debt.
And like void already mentioned, Democrats wanted to go even more crazy on covid lockdowns and deficit spending.
Also note that Biden's deficit in FY 2024 was almost twice as high as Trump's already bad deficit from 2019 ($0.98T):

Three years after covid, with an economy which according to the rhetoric of his own administration was roaring, there was no justification whatsoever for such a spending spree.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Apr 10 2025 09:37am