i will take this to mean: yes we deem everything in gaza as a legitimate target.

your deflection abilities are special!

to respond to your other post:

1. an act of aggression. what about all the 1000's of acts of aggression on Gaza before Oct 7th? eek this must be quite difficult for you. well done for repeatedly not responding on this point but im confused. you are happy to refer to flattening all of gaza as "precision" but cant come up with an excuse for the repeated incursions into gaza prior to Oct 7th. a conundrum!

2. I think the images tell their own story

3. Does Gaza or the West Bank have rights to protect their citizens ? eek, imagine if roles were reversed. awkward!

4. You have used this as an excuse repeatedly. because Hamas has an unrealistic goal of wiping out Israel, Israel's response is to wipe out Gaza. So your no better then Hamas, is that what your saying ?

5. fair point! ok i am being harsh today but you are triggering me so lets continue

6. Israel had the ability to assassinate the top leadership of Gaza. They chose instead to flatten Gaza. prime real estate i guess!

7. fine

and fine, whilst noting that there has been a shift in US ~ Israeli dynamic (namely, Donald Trump).

PGMs? Which ones? What military infrastructure?

"Making targeting complex" - come on now fam

1.The claim that Israel carried out “thousands of acts of aggression” before Oct 7th is out of context. Prior to Oct 7th, Israel was responding to persistent rocket fire, terrorist attacks, and incursions from Hamas. Military operations were aimed at neutralizing threats, not launching unprovoked assaults. Comparing these responses to Hamas’ massacre on Oct 7th, where civilians were deliberately targeted, is misleading.

2. Images of destruction in Gaza do not tell the full story. They do not differentiate between military targets and collateral damage in an urban warzone where Hamas embeds itself within civilian areas. The images lack context about how and why destruction occurs—such as Hamas launching attacks from within hospitals and schools.

3. Yes, Palestinian civilians have a right to safety, but Hamas and the Palestinian Authority (PA) are responsible for governance and security. Hamas, instead of protecting Gazans, uses them as human shields, diverts humanitarian aid for weapons, and launches attacks that provoke Israeli retaliation. If Hamas were genuinely defending civilians, it would not embed its military assets in civilian infrastructure.

4. Israel is not trying to “wipe out” Gaza; it is eliminating Hamas, a terrorist organization that started this war. Hamas’ stated goal is Israel’s destruction, whereas Israel’s goal is to remove Hamas’ military capability while minimizing civilian casualties. The fact that Israel issues evacuation warnings and allows humanitarian aid contradicts the claim of indiscriminate destruction.

5…

6.Israel has targeted Hamas leadership before, but eliminating individual leaders does not dismantle an entire terrorist infrastructure. Hamas is deeply entrenched in Gaza, with thousands of fighters, weapons stockpiles, and underground tunnels. A full-scale military operation is necessary to ensure long-term security rather than just a temporary setback for Hamas.

Your claims misrepresent the context, ignore Hamas’ tactics, and conflate Israel’s military objectives with indiscriminate aggression.

Dismissing these points with sarcasm doesn’t change the facts

Make up your mind. First you say all Palestinians are Hamapalestinians, then you say Israel is using precision guided munitions to target Hamas Infrastructure, and now you say images of Gaza do not tell the full story. Genuinely confused with your logic now.
1. All Palestinians are not Hamas, can a baby killed in a hospital be hamas ?
2. You are dropping 2000 lbs bombs on Gaza. Precision is a relative term now noting it will level an area the size of a city block.
3. I tried to find the most panoramic view of Gaza's destruction. I refute your claims re: precision. this is flattening all of gaza. thats the only thing that is precise and methodical about this. 92% of all housing has been flattened. precision my ass.

I would argue that these images DO tell the full story, the full extent of the horror inflicted on a minority oppressed for decades. these bombs took their homes, flattened the land by right of conquest, your words remember. They killed 1200? on Oct 7th, and Israel has in return killed 65K~/+. Are are so convinced in your superiority. holy moly.

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 22 2025 05:10am

:

1. True, but Hamas governs Gaza and embeds itself within civilian areas, making it difficult to separate combatants from non-combatants. Israel argues that targeting Hamas inevitably results in civilian casualties because of Hamas’ tactics. The baby in a hospital is a tragedy, but if Hamas operates from civilian areas, does Israel have any choice?

2. Precision-guided munitions are still more accurate than unguided weapons. War is destructive by nature, and targeting military infrastructure in dense urban areas will inevitably cause collateral damage. The alternative—doing nothing—allows Hamas to continue operating freely.

3. Photos show destruction, but they lack context where are these places? What was targeted? Hamas tunnels and command centers exist under civilian infrastructure. Just seeing a flattened building doesn’t prove it wasn’t a legitimate target. War is ugly, but without understanding the full tactical situation, images alone don’t tell the whole story.

You are the one cherry picking not me

How you can argue this with a straight face is beyond me. Thats a rhetorical statement, you dont have to reply.

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 22 2025 09:35am

Haha vatnik who dines from Putins ass trying to use morals as an argument. This is all about geo-politics, not about Gaza actually.


This post was edited by Fnall on Mar 22 2025 04:47pm

Read Mein Kampf