i believe your logical fallacy is "non sequitur"

First post was argument that atheist calling is adhominem.
You read that and got confused
So second post I explained why it was adhominem by giving literal definition
Now you are deflecting and mislabeled as "red herring"

Which further proves you have no idea what you are talking about and my earlier claim you are a logical fallacy

That's because it's a joke/meme. I know, hard concept to understand.

ad hominem
/hŏm′ə-nĕm″, -nəm/
noun
(logical fallacy) A fallacious objection to an argument or factual claim by appealing to a characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim; an attempt to argue against an opponent's idea by discrediting the opponent himself.

so? your saying calling someone a atheist is discrediting?



this is not a joke/meme thread so lets try and stay on topic

I was on topic 100% lmao.

Logical follicles

this channel is a good source
Trailer: Critical Thinking, Logic, Argumentation

Tell me what kind of logical fallacy is A is using?

A: this napkin is the one true religion.
B: how do we know it's the one true religion?
A: because its says so right here on this napkin.

i didnt read a single word but the answer to all your problems is just do what you wanna do

circular reasoning. havent we done this before? o? ok? it will be good for the thread good idea ty