d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > European Union News > What's Up In The Eu.
Prev1688689690691692717Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 19,309
Joined: Feb 24 2018
Gold: 9,765.50
Feb 28 2025 03:55am
When they said "Trump is a threat to democracy", what they actually meant was "threat to (D)emocracy", as in "the rule of Democrats".


Same shitty rhetoric in my country, where left-wing parties constantly harp on about how "democratic parties need to band together and cooperate". There's clearly nothing more democratic than trying to ostracized and completely neuter the political representation of more than a fifth of the electorate.

So, Merz asked about NGOs who are financed by the government USaid style. Lars Kilngbeil made himself SPD chief without regard to the basis, Esken isn't showing any intention of leaving her post :lol:
Now, Merz is clear cut and I am impressed by him: he refuses to engange into any discussion with someone who has zero support in her party, Esken. He wants no NGOs and shaddy financing of shadow government. Lars Klingbeil's wife is one of CEOs of a NGO :lol:
So basically, let us syphon more money or no coalition talks as a party who lost everything with the worst result ever. I think Merz might enter a coalition with AfD but the political cost for his reputation is too high at the moment. He wants to descredit SPD some more until he is "forced" to enter a coalition with the AfD with little political cost. SPD is behaving maximaly dumb.
However, almost four-fifths of the population in Germany voted in favour of parties that had already ruled out cooperation with a party that is classified by the German security authorities as "partially far-right extremist" before the election.
8O% >>>>>20%

You've missed the point. The election was one with the highest participation rate. Government parties lost the majourity, less than 50%. People in Germany want a change, not a "weiter so". Either SPD commits to real changes from the current "weiter so" status quo or they should get the fuck out with their Brandmauer. CDU engaging in any kind of foul compromises against the will of their voters is antidemocratic.

This post was edited by babun1024 on Feb 28 2025 04:00am
Member
Posts: 7,837
Joined: Jul 7 2005
Gold: 12,385.00
Feb 28 2025 05:40am

You've missed the point. The election was one with the highest participation rate. Government parties lost the majourity, less than 50%. People in Germany want a change, not a "weiter so". Either SPD commits to real changes from the current "weiter so" status quo or they should get the fuck out with their Brandmauer. CDU engaging in any kind of foul compromises against the will of their voters is antidemocratic.


Nothing in your text refutes my statement. It may be that people want change, but the vast majority do not want changes made by the AfD.
Member
Posts: 54,052
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Feb 28 2025 05:51am
Nothing in your text refutes my statement. It may be that people want change, but the vast majority do not want changes made by the AfD.


You just inadvertently summed up the conundrum of German politics: many of the central policy demands of the AfD enjoy majority support, but voters don't want these policies to be enacted by the AfD. On the flip side, the CDU would love to win back voters who defected to the AfD, but these voters don't trust the CDU's words anymore, the only way to win them back is through tangible action - but the only way for the CDU to produce these tangible results would require them to cooperate with the AfD. Any time the CDU instead forms a coalition with the SPD or Greens, their credibility with former-CDU-now-AfD voters decreases even further.

At some point, something has to give in German politics. But we're not there yet.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Feb 28 2025 05:51am
Member
Posts: 39,614
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Feb 28 2025 06:02am
You just inadvertently summed up the conundrum of German politics: many of the central policy demands of the AfD enjoy majority support, but voters don't want these policies to be enacted by the AfD. On the flip side, the CDU would love to win back voters who defected to the AfD, but these voters don't trust the CDU's words anymore, the only way to win them back is through tangible action - but the only way for the CDU to produce these tangible results would require them to cooperate with the AfD. Any time the CDU instead forms a coalition with the SPD or Greens, their credibility with former-CDU-now-AfD voters decreases even further.

At some point, something has to give in German politics. But we're not there yet.


Entschuldigen Sie bitte im Voraus für mein schlechtes Deutsch. Ich interessiere mich für die politische Situation in Deutschland und die Wahrnehmung der Partei AfD. Gibt es Ihrer Meinung nach einen Zusammenhang zwischen der Ablehnung der AfD und der deutschen Vergangenheit, insbesondere im Hinblick auf die Entnazifizierung und die Sorge vor einem neuen Aufstieg populistischer Bewegungen, die an Hitler erinnern könnten?
Member
Posts: 19,309
Joined: Feb 24 2018
Gold: 9,765.50
Feb 28 2025 06:11am
Nothing in your text refutes my statement. It may be that people want change, but the vast majority do not want changes made by the AfD.

Mimimi, CDU and AfD gained more than 50% of the votes because they promised to address the migration problems, economy and the security in inland. You don't want AfD to reign right? Well, Germany can have a coalition of CDU + SPD but SPD has to give in the points where the majourity of German people are concerned, namely migration, security in inland and economy. If they don't CDU would be engaging in foul compromises with the SPD against the will of the majourity. Stupid SPD fucks who shouldn't be in the government in the first place, don't take the chance. Instead, they want another weiter so. I hope CDU stands firm.
Esken is an idiot who should resign, Klingbeil is a corrupt fuck who directly syphons money to his wife's NGO. SPD needs new people. I also don't understand what the embarrassment of the century, Baerbock, is doing. She should resign, another Esken with 0 accountability.

This post was edited by babun1024 on Feb 28 2025 06:13am
Member
Posts: 19,309
Joined: Feb 24 2018
Gold: 9,765.50
Feb 28 2025 06:43am
Entschuldigen Sie bitte im Voraus für mein schlechtes Deutsch. Ich interessiere mich für die politische Situation in Deutschland und die Wahrnehmung der Partei AfD. Gibt es Ihrer Meinung nach einen Zusammenhang zwischen der Ablehnung der AfD und der deutschen Vergangenheit, insbesondere im Hinblick auf die Entnazifizierung und die Sorge vor einem neuen Aufstieg populistischer Bewegungen, die an Hitler erinnern könnten?

About AfD: They've got a far right wing similar to rednecks in the Republican party. You can't take them seriously until they totally distance themselves from them, however they need those far right merchants to get voters to vote for them in east Germany. East Germany has got really run down, poor regions abandoned by the state where every able person flees to the west and dumb/old people who remain are easy prey for the extreme left and extreme right. Coincidentally, AfD and die Linke are most popular there.
Yes, partly due to the history and partly due to the extreme right wing in the AfD, most German including me don't want them to represent Germany.

But, the issues that brought them 20% of votes and made CDU win is of concern to the majourity of the population in Germany: security in inland, uncontrolled migration, crumbling economy. SPD acts as if there is no migration problem (not kidding), especially the dumb fuck Esken. Instead of a proper restructuring (SPD had the most voter losses), Lars Klingbeil made himself the chief :lol: No regards to the base SPD voters.

Friedrich Merz wants a coalition with the SPD but he doesn't want to betray his voters. They lost last time by ignoring those issues like SPD. This time around, they've got the mandate with the promise to deal with those problems. He completely ignores Esken because she is from the far left wing of the SPD. There is no common ground for a coalition with her in any function. She should just resign. They organize demos or try to change public opinion USaid style by NGOs paid with taxpayer money :lol: The newest example is "Omas gegen rechts". I have an understanding for an NGO engaging in environmental conservation, research, imporving education etc. with taxpayer money but absolutely against weaponizing NGOs against political adversaries in inland. Merz asked about politically engaged NGO's financing (he wants to get rid of those NGOs). Lars Klingbeil, the current self-proclaimed chief of SPD whose wife is one of CEOs of those NGOs is against those reforms. And that's HIS condition (not the voters) to enter any type of coalition talks :lol:
Fuck the current SPD full of lunatics. Willy Brandt would turn in his grave multiple times if he knew what has become of his party.

This post was edited by babun1024 on Feb 28 2025 06:46am
Member
Posts: 39,614
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Feb 28 2025 07:05am
About AfD: They've got a far right wing similar to rednecks in the Republican party. You can't take them seriously until they totally distance themselves from them, however they need those far right merchants to get voters to vote for them in east Germany. East Germany has got really run down, poor regions abandoned by the state where every able person flees to the west and dumb/old people who remain are easy prey for the extreme left and extreme right. Coincidentally, AfD and die Linke are most popular there.
Yes, partly due to the history and partly due to the extreme right wing in the AfD, most German including me don't want them to represent Germany.

But, the issues that brought them 20% of votes and made CDU win is of concern to the majourity of the population in Germany: security in inland, uncontrolled migration, crumbling economy. SPD acts as if there is no migration problem (not kidding), especially the dumb fuck Esken. Instead of a proper restructuring (SPD had the most voter losses), Lars Klingbeil made himself the chief :lol: No regards to the base SPD voters.

Friedrich Merz wants a coalition with the SPD but he doesn't want to betray his voters. They lost last time by ignoring those issues like SPD. This time around, they've got the mandate with the promise to deal with those problems. He completely ignores Esken because she is from the far left wing of the SPD. There is no common ground for a coalition with her in any function. She should just resign. They organize demos or try to change public opinion USaid style by NGOs paid with taxpayer money :lol: The newest example is "Omas gegen rechts". I have an understanding for an NGO engaging in environmental conservation, research, imporving education etc. with taxpayer money but absolutely against weaponizing NGOs against political adversaries in inland. Merz asked about politically engaged NGO's financing (he wants to get rid of those NGOs). Lars Klingbeil, the current self-proclaimed chief of SPD whose wife is one of CEOs of those NGOs is against those reforms. And that's HIS condition (not the voters) to enter any type of coalition talks :lol:
Fuck the current SPD full of lunatics. Willy Brandt would turn in his grave multiple times if he knew what has become of his party.


Eine gefährliche Tendenz ist es, entwickelnde oder rückständige Regionen den Populisten zu überlassen. Besonders im Lichte des Beispiels der Ukraine.
Member
Posts: 19,309
Joined: Feb 24 2018
Gold: 9,765.50
Feb 28 2025 07:33am
Eine gefährliche Tendenz ist es, entwickelnde oder rückständige Regionen den Populisten zu überlassen. Besonders im Lichte des Beispiels der Ukraine.



You can turn on commentary. He is Lars Klingbeil, the new chief of SPD. He promises to reform the party after being one of the reasons to ruin the party. He is against the government asking about what the NGOs are doing with the government money. His wife is the CEO of a NGO. He also threatened to drop coalition talks with Merz if he hears anything again from the media instead of Merz himself during coalition talks. Asking about NGOs is Merz fraction's right. He doesn't need Klingbeil's permission.

This post was edited by babun1024 on Feb 28 2025 07:34am
Member
Posts: 39,614
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Feb 28 2025 07:40am
Ich hoffe, ich habe das richtig verstanden? Omas gegen die Rechten? Klingt wie Bienen gegen Honig. Lustig. Das ist doch praktisch die Generation des Volkssturms.
Member
Posts: 5,377
Joined: Feb 5 2022
Gold: 2,200.11
Feb 28 2025 08:06am
The German Government has set up a new advisory office aimed at supporting those affected by conspiracy narratives, misinformation and disinformation.

Announced in Berlin on February 27, the Advisory Compass Conspiracy Thinking initiative was backed by the Federal Ministry of Family Affairs and the Interior Ministry.

Outgoing interior minister Nancy Faeser of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) warned that conspiracy narratives were “deliberately spread to divide society and erode trust in independent science, free media, and democratic institutions”.

While acknowledging that free debate was essential in a democracy, she argued such narratives “can fuel extremist ideologies and incite criminal or violent acts, with antisemitic conspiracy theories being particularly widespread”.
https://brusselssignal.eu/2025/02/german-government-launches-initiative-to-target-conspiracy-thinking/

If Germany had more rednecks, this tomfoolery would never have taken root.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1688689690691692717Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll