How is something that hasn't happened "a very real scenario"?

If anything, Trump having Elon go and fire people who are either not needed or who hold an opposite agenda to the President is less likely to cause leaks, and more likely to prevent them.

The "very real scenario" was seen from 2017 to 2021, where hangers-on who should have been fired and/or had their access revoked were actively leaking.

It seems to me that you should be celebrating that likely leakers are being removed.

Your brain can't think of scenarios that could become a reality that have not happened yet?

You have less braincells' left than I thought.

I don't subscribe to Rachael Maddow.

You can bring up all the hypotheticals you want. I'd rather focus on reality. The reality is, the "leaking" we saw from Trump's first Administration came primary from those in the Administration and Bureaucracy who were against Trump and/or his agenda.

Thus, having Elon remove those people IS dealing with the most likely "leak" scenario.

Pretending that something that hasn't happened, that there's no evidence WILL happen is the most likely scenario, and the reason why a repeat scenario shouldn't be prevented is so dumb it's funny.

Perhaps you shouldn't be discussing relative braincell counts.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Feb 19 2025 10:44am

Well I guess for your own mental health you should avoid engaging or find an online safe space that does not trigger you so hard when people talk about things that could potentially happen.

Some people are just so sensitive that they get triggered when other users are talking to each other.

You've got funny ideas of people being triggered. I called you out for handwringing over random conspiracy theories and hit you with reality.

Now you've resorted to nonsensical personal insults, rather than admitting that the actions of DOGE are likely to LIMIT leaking.

But please, by all means, continue your performative nonsense. If nothing else, the stupidity is entertaining.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Feb 19 2025 10:56am

Leopards eating their own faces already
American companies crying about the price hikes
Farmers who voted for Trump crying they can't sell their food through government programs now

I love watching it happen in real time

Bob you don't really know what a conspiracy theory is eh, such event has not happened to make it a conspiracy theory. I was stating what could happen.

Bob get off the booze. That poor last brain cell.

Once again, failure to admit reality, followed by weak, schoolyard attempts at personal insults.



So, let's get this straight. The Trump Administration has NOT suffered the leaks, to date, that they suffered the first go around.

You claim is that they will/may/possiblysortakindmaybewill? And how's it going to happen? DOGE, a department created by Obama specifically to remove waste in Federal spending as well as limit access to sensitive data by those with no need to it, is somehow, under Trump, going to be responsible for the very leaks that they're helping to prevent. And who's going to be responsible? An employee in good standing. Why? Because he has a name you don't like and is "young".

So, DOGE is a grand conspiracy, started by Obama, to leak all of your information to the masses, that has NOT functioned in that fashion, but is now magically going to start functioning in that fashion, because of some shady Trump plot?

Once again, there was constant leaking during the first Trump Administration. The majority of it came from unelected, unappointed bureaucrats. The very unelected, unappointed Bureaucrats that DOGE is eliminating.

What sounds more realistic? That the people terminating the leakers are going to leak, or that leaks are going to be far less frequent than the first go around due to the termination of the leakers?

Given the lack of leaks we're experiencing right now, I'd guess the first option is the reality. But feel free to continue pushing your random conspiracy theories.

I'll give you a moment to think up your next poor attempt at a personal insult while the reality kicks in.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Feb 19 2025 11:12am

What are you talking about. I implied it was simply a possible event that they could end up leaking data based on recent events such as not being able to secure their own doge website.

That is not a conspiracy theory.

Holy, its like talking to a triggered 3 year old.

A conspiracy theory would be if data was leaked and I said doge did it without any evidence to support such a thing. But that is not the chain of events here.


This post was edited by SBD on Feb 19 2025 11:14am

A possible event is that a meteor hits the Earth in the next 365 days and wipes out all life.

Does that mean that everyone on the planet should immediately give up on law and order and live out their wildest fantasies because "we're all maybe gonna die anyway"?

There's a non-zero chance you will die from a heart attack in the next 60 seconds. Does that mean I should call 9/11 and have them dispatch paramedics to your home?

Again, the reality is that there was CONSTANT leaking in the first Trump Administration, and there is CONSTANT waste in the federal government. DOGE appears to be helping to limit both.

Saying "DOGE employees could leak all the information!" as a possibility is to ignore the fact that the department has existed since 2014 and done no such thing. Nor is there a single shred of evidence to point that they will.

Weird, huh?