A simple search of your posts shows you supporting and defending every trans policy that has come up for debate.

You actively promote affirming this form of body dysmorphia mental disorder and mutilating those who suffer from it, rather than providing proper psychiatric help.

You actively promote allowing competition in female sports leagues for these mentally ill men.

You actively promoted allowing these mentally ill men into female prisons.

You actively defended the Nashville tranny shooter after she shot up a bunch of innocent kids and tried to blame "guns".

You're a broken record. Everything you stand for is anti women.

Know what I want to see? I want to see every single woman arm herself with a .38 snub, and any time these mentally ill troonies try to assault them, blow his fucking balls off.

But that's right, you don't believe that women should have the right to arm themselves with "the great equalizer", so that no matter how big and bad the man trying to rape, assault, or kill her is, she still stands a good shot at not being victimized. You want take their rights to weapons away, too.

Tell me, how long have you hated women? WAS it beating your child's mother that is why she's not part of your life?

Prove these lies, ill wait.

I don't need to Matt. Your post history speaks for itself. And the most telling thing? You entered this topic of conversation in defense of a man competing in a combat sport in a women's league.

Did Fallon Fox over-perform? Yes, absolutely. He was not qualified to compete in a male league at all. He was epic shit. Yet he went 5-1 beating up women. A man so bad he did not QUALIFY to compete at all, 5-1 vs women. Why? Natural, biological advantage.

So, keep supporting men abusing women, Matt. And I'll continue pointing it out. Keep trying to defend your promoting mentally ill men in women-only spaces, Matt. I'll continue point it out.

Why do you hate women, Matt?

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Feb 17 2025 02:21am

I never defended anyone, I pointed out that fallon fox was a nobody who never made it anywhere in the sport and was beaten badly by a woman.
Amanda nunes won 12 back to back fights against people who would kill fallon fox, 5-1 in b league mma is nothing impressive.
I asked what man has over performed in mma because people claim all this nonsense about trans men having such a huge advantage.
I don't think they should be fighting woman but I also doubt the advantage is as big as is made out after they meet the requirements to compete.
Nothing I have seen has changed my mind.
If fallon fox started in the ufc she would be 0-6.

Fallon Fox was a nobody MAN. A MAN who did not QUALIFY for ANY male league of mixed martial arts. He was not "beaten badly" by a woman. He was BARELY beaten, in the third round, by his 4th opponent, after destroying his first three opponents. He then went on to completely demolish two more female opponents, the last so severely that he broke her face and ended her career.

That is the PERFECT example of a man over-performing. From, "You aren't good enough to compete PERIOD" to "Better winning record than the majority of Mixed Martial Artists, and an actual woman's career ended and life altered permanently due to his abuse."

You try to make up fantasy scenarios where all these women would "DESTROY" Fallon Fox. Yet no woman EVER destroyed Fallon Fox. Even the fight he lost didn't leave so much as a bruise to be seen by the next week. And Nunes had the chance to fight him and refused. So did Rousey. For the same reason. "He's a man. He doesn't belong fighting women."

Your question's answer is very clear: Fallon Fox over-performed like crazy. Average win:loss ratio in MMA is .500. Not 100%. Not 80%. 50%. Fallon Fox, a MAN, was batting .833 in the women's league. A man who DID NOT QUALIFY in any man's league. That is EXTREME over-performance.

The advantage is huge. And go tell the woman whose career he ended, who's face he broke, that "the advatage isn't as big as is made out to be."

If Fallon Fox started in the UFC, that would mean that the UFC endorsed Men beating women, and the UFC would be full of men beating up women. There would no longer be women in the women's league. The danger to women from facing men in the Octagon is far too high. Nunes wouldn't even rank top 100 in the men's league.

And it's funny as fuck that you won't even TOUCH the gold medal winner MAN at the OLYMPICS. You're transparent.

"As long as I THINK it sounds like a fair fight, men should be able to beat on women."

You're a monster, Matt.

How long have you hated women, Matt?

lol people keep voting in poll
it was at 747 total
record it were it is right now. be pretty close to were it was election nite
want trump to win
(425 Votes)56.67%

want trump to lose
(219 Votes)29.20%

REEEEEEEEEEEE
(106 Votes)14.13%

750 Total Votes

This post was edited by TiStuff on Feb 17 2025 08:13am

Similarly bad was the mid latina that Disney cast for the role of Snow White - a role whose defining optical feature is her immaculately pale skin, which is explicitly mentioned and described in the book.

Rumors for the new Harry Potter TV series are that Severus Snape is going to be cast as a black guy

Pretty sure Wheel of Time was among the worst. Somehow you have a secluded village that sees nothing but the occasional gleeman or a certain peddler, and has been that way for hundreds of years, and somehow it holds all the world's diversity. Like... "They uh... Don't have newcomers much... Why do they all look so different? Interbreeding should have cured them of that."