Your entire existence is a logical fallacy. It would be difficult to find a debate where you don't resort to using logical fallacies.

Circular reasoning, appeal to authority, appeal to emotion, magic, strawmanning, red herring (your favourite), equovication, motte and bailey etc etc

yours is assertion fallacy

Not interested.

You assert magic is real without proof is the definition of assertion fallacy lmk.

you assert that i make magic claims therefore assertion fallacy

Did you stop believing in your sky wizard what am I missing here?

Pard remove it.

I've been believing in the religious power of cheeseburgers, I ate one, then I found out I had a retirement fund I never knew I had and now I have 3000$ you should really start going to McDonald's more often tistuff

the topic is logical fallcies. so red herring?



your fallacy is non sequitur?



yours also? non sequitur?
i think also your comment would be considered spam as jsp understands the definition of spam? something that has never really been clarified?

This post was edited by TiStuff on Jan 31 2025 09:25pm

I very seriously posted this maam please do not discriminate