d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Putin Already Lost The War In Ukraine
Prev19192939495120Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 34,824
Joined: May 16 2024
Gold: 0.00
Jan 22 2025 04:09pm
Yes, thank you


Have a good day sir :thumbsup:







Member
Posts: 16,411
Joined: Apr 9 2007
Gold: 12,059.17
Jan 22 2025 04:27pm
NATO is the only reason we have this conflict in the first place. So no, NATO impact is not “minimal”. This is admitted by literally every single source in 2025. Wake up and smell the coffee.

All propaganda is propaganda. For the past 3 years I struggled to see fair assessments of Russia/ Ukraine war in MSM from publications I used to respect like Financial Times and The Economist. I have now found other sources that are trying to stick to facts like BNE Intelligence (founder is banned from Russia). So no; your attempt at “free world soap opera versus Russian propaganda” misses the spot again.

Your ammo passages is just pure cope, I’m sorry.

Riddle me this buddy, what goes harder 1 super precise Patriot missile worth USD 4M or 100 Geran drones worth USD 40K a pop? Do you want to bring out your GDP per capita chart again? Or perhaps the “russians are stealing porcelain toilets and dishwashers to build Iskander missiles” cope I’ve read in so many “respectable” and “free” western outlets? Are we really going over this again?


There are four reasons why we have this conflict:
a) Russia desperately needs people because they are low people country and their population further declining.
b) Ukraine was an important part of USSR empire, with all the factories, engineers etc.
c) Ukraine is first on Russia way towards west Europe.
d) Ukraine soil is rich, and food is an important asset in world geopolitics. You can influence and overtake poor countries with food.

Of course all evil people needed an excuse, Hitler said that jewish people are a risk for German people, and for Putin this excuse was NATO existence in Europe.
Everybody sane knows that absolutely fucking nobody in democratic western world wants to invade Russia, a biggest country in the world that also has most nukes in the world.
Member
Posts: 16,411
Joined: Apr 9 2007
Gold: 12,059.17
Jan 22 2025 04:33pm
The height of the massacres occurred in July and August 1943. So, are you suggesting Bandera somehow telepathically orchestrated the massacre of Poles from his prison cell in Germany, where he was wasting away? I thought he hated Jews and fought for the Nazis against the Soviets, but it turns out he was imprisoned by the Nazis despite being a Nazi himself. Maybe his sieg heil wasn’t enthusiastic enough. It’s a pity he died 80 years ago—yet he still manages to irritate every Russian to this day, daily. Elon might’ve been able to train him in that regard...


Bandera wanted to use Nazi as a tool, ally to get his country independence.
But Hitler didnt want that so he imprisoned Bandera.
Various countries played their politics during WW2 with Nazi: Hungary, Italy and Japan allied with Hitler.
If we dont blame these 3 countries today any longer, we shouldnt really blame too much Ukrainian Hitler supporters during WW2.
Of course it would be better if today ukrainians had a better, less controversial heroes to worship, but it seems they dont have another heroes to worship.
Its like countries worship their kings - sure they did horrible things, there was slavery, wars, inquisition etc but these kings kind of started our countries, so we still see them as heroes, despite the controversies.

This post was edited by Ironfister on Jan 22 2025 04:35pm
Member
Posts: 9,693
Joined: Mar 2 2006
Gold: 1,590.00
Jan 23 2025 12:19am
There are four reasons why we have this conflict:
a) Russia desperately needs people because they are low people country and their population further declining.
b) Ukraine was an important part of USSR empire, with all the factories, engineers etc.
c) Ukraine is first on Russia way towards west Europe.
d) Ukraine soil is rich, and food is an important asset in world geopolitics. You can influence and overtake poor countries with food.

Of course all evil people needed an excuse, Hitler said that jewish people are a risk for German people, and for Putin this excuse was NATO existence in Europe.
Everybody sane knows that absolutely fucking nobody in democratic western world wants to invade Russia, a biggest country in the world that also has most nukes in the world.


Again, you seem to completely dodge the comment and continue along the road of spewing factual lies.

1) Russia is the biggest country in Europe both in population and people. Double that of Germany. They literally don’t need more people.

2) Lands that modern Ukraine inherited after the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991 were a critical part of Russian empire for half a millennia. Russians fought tooth and nail against the Mongols and the Ottomans and then built all the cities we now take for granted.

3) Russia has no interest and no ability to pick a fight with Europe. It’s some ridiculous scare tactic used by warmongers to justify propping up military industrial complex. Nothing more, nothing less.

4) That much is true, Eastern Ukraine soil is rich and it produces a lot of food. Russia is a bigger food producer and exporter and doesn’t need extra land. Majority of food Ukraine produced in 2022-2024 went to rich countries like France and Netherlands, not Sudan or Egypt where they need it most.

Europe has invaded Russia several times and were successfully repelled and fought back which resulted in complete collapse of the invading alliance. In 19th century it was called the French Empire. In 20th century it was called The Axis. In 21st century its called NATO. NATO has been invading and destroying countries for the fuck of it for the past 30 years. Russians see all these invasions and know they are next on the line for a “peacekeeping operation to protect the indigineous people of Tobolsk” or some other bizzaro shit if they let it happen and don’t act. When you read public white papers from RAND dated 2019 outlying in minuscule details how to defeat Russia , one has to wonder what goes unpublished?
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR3000/RR3063/RAND_RR3063.pdf


This post was edited by Malopox on Jan 23 2025 12:49am
Member
Posts: 15,918
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jan 23 2025 01:02am
So we get 12 bln EUR from EU.
And we pay 44 bln EUR military budget, to defend ourselves and EU from Russia.

44 bln - 12 bln EUR it means we are paying 32 bln net EUR "tax" as a part of EU world.
Take us out and Germany has to increase their military spending by about 40bln, as they would be EU border country by then.
So we save them 15bln EUR (40 bln EUR - 25 bln EUR they send to EU).
So we got absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. Other european countries should be more ashamed that they cut their military budgets and rely on USA, Ukraine, Poland and some other countries for their own security.


I guess you agree then that people in NATO countries pay for NATO military spending including military aid to Ukraine?

Yesterday you said this

-->

How much money have average NATO citizen spent on helping Ukraine?
Not much, if not 0.

On the other hand when you live in N. Korea you dont really a choice, you are ordered to make arms for mr Putin and you do it if you want to eat something from time to time.
This is the key difference here.
Also Russians might not have toilets, instead of making sewer pipes they make tank pipes.
Different priorities.
So we can say that they are poor as hell, but it doesnt make them bad warriors. quite the contrary, if you are used to live in poor conditions you will have easier time living on the frontline.


So what is it?
Member
Posts: 16,411
Joined: Apr 9 2007
Gold: 12,059.17
Jan 23 2025 02:35am
I guess you agree then that people in NATO countries pay for NATO military spending including military aid to Ukraine?

Yesterday you said this

-->



So what is it?


Here in Poland we send to Ukraine mainly equipment that is near its expiration date.
Better to use it against potential enemy than to throw it away in some years.
Also I meant "Citizen", which is slightly different than "government" spending.
Government gets its money from citizens, but also from corporations, selling resources, selling various licenses and permits etc.
In western world people live relatively luxury lives, but when you ask average people "why dont YOU help Ukraine by sending them some money or material aid" they make multiple excuses like "covid, inflation, lack of time, I'm tired of war etc"
Governments in Europe are usually smarter than citizens, so they try to "sneak" some help to Ukraine, because they prefer Ukraine to stop Russia instead of Nato fighting with Russia, but they cant do much against their voters will, so the help aint big.
Member
Posts: 15,918
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jan 23 2025 04:20am
Here in Poland we send to Ukraine mainly equipment that is near its expiration date.
Better to use it against potential enemy than to throw it away in some years.
Also I meant "Citizen", which is slightly different than "government" spending.
Government gets its money from citizens, but also from corporations, selling resources, selling various licenses and permits etc.
In western world people live relatively luxury lives, but when you ask average people "why dont YOU help Ukraine by sending them some money or material aid" they make multiple excuses like "covid, inflation, lack of time, I'm tired of war etc"
Governments in Europe are usually smarter than citizens, so they try to "sneak" some help to Ukraine, because they prefer Ukraine to stop Russia instead of Nato fighting with Russia, but they cant do much against their voters will, so the help aint big.


Poland would've just kept using it's military hardware just like other East European countries that were still using old Soviet military hardware from the cold war. We all know that.

As a matter of fact at the start of the war East European countries only gave their old Soviet kit away to Ukraine because NATO promised that it would be replaced.

These replacements are not free and taxpayers will need to pay for it and it's not cheap or "little".

NATO support to Ukraine has cost hundreds of billions that's the bottom line.
Member
Posts: 16,411
Joined: Apr 9 2007
Gold: 12,059.17
Jan 23 2025 04:52am
Poland would've just kept using it's military hardware just like other East European countries that were still using old Soviet military hardware from the cold war. We all know that.

As a matter of fact at the start of the war East European countries only gave their old Soviet kit away to Ukraine because NATO promised that it would be replaced.

These replacements are not free and taxpayers will need to pay for it and it's not cheap or "little".

NATO support to Ukraine has cost hundreds of billions that's the bottom line.


Poland in 2002 paid only 1euro to Germany for 15 MIG planes.
Germany were basically throwing them away.
22 years ago Poland was way poorer than today, at least we had *some* planes thanks to it.
After 20 more years we gave these planes to Ukraine:)
Their combat value is discusable. Russians are using Mig planes, that's true, but they use modernized version, while NATO only has old versions, that didnt get any upgrades. Also Russia has always given weaker versions of weapons to us, they knew we dont like their occupation of our country and can revolt one day. Smart Russian people, must admit it - we know them, they know us :)

Anyway it could be that NATO spent some resources helping Ukraine, but it was spent in NATO best interest.
Russia burned through their cold war equipment reserves, and lost about a million soldiers, what means they are less likely to attack NATO.

This post was edited by Ironfister on Jan 23 2025 04:52am
Member
Posts: 31,666
Joined: Dec 29 2016
Gold: 291,611.20
Warn: 10%
Jan 23 2025 05:41am
Smart Russian people, must admit it - we know them, they know us :)


Probably another reason you hate them so much, you are both slavs.
Member
Posts: 15,918
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jan 23 2025 05:47am
Poland in 2002 paid only 1euro to Germany for 15 MIG planes.
Germany were basically throwing them away.
22 years ago Poland was way poorer than today, at least we had *some* planes thanks to it.
After 20 more years we gave these planes to Ukraine:)
Their combat value is discusable. Russians are using Mig planes, that's true, but they use modernized version, while NATO only has old versions, that didnt get any upgrades. Also Russia has always given weaker versions of weapons to us, they knew we dont like their occupation of our country and can revolt one day. Smart Russian people, must admit it - we know them, they know us :)

Anyway it could be that NATO spent some resources helping Ukraine, but it was spent in NATO best interest.
Russia burned through their cold war equipment reserves, and lost about a million soldiers, what means they are less likely to attack NATO.


So Poland got a very good deal. Maybe Germany (or better said NATO) thought that it was a good idea to bolster Poland's military taking into account you'd only joined NATO in 1999? See what I did there? Proving the point that NATO is expanding East and pumping military hardware into the new member countries ;)

Anyways those planes never had a 1 Euro price tag, military hardware is very expensive taking into account research and development and everything that comes with it.

When are you going to be honest and agree that this is a simple fact, that military aid to Ukraine has cost billions?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev19192939495120Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll