You say North Korea and Iran impact is minimal, and I say NATO impact is minimal.
How can we know if you are right or I am?
Russia propaganda says one thing, western free media says otherwise. I trust more free world media than Russia propaganda, but I understand some people fallen for Russia propaganda.
About ammo production: western people arent scared so they dont produce ammo, they elect politicians, who dont produce ammo, to rule Europe.
This is risky, but what can I do.
Also western ammunition is more precise, so you need less of them than Russian ammunition.
NATO is the only reason we have this conflict in the first place. So no, NATO impact is not “minimal”. This is admitted by literally every single source in 2025. Wake up and smell the coffee.
All propaganda is propaganda. For the past 3 years I struggled to see fair assessments of Russia/ Ukraine war in MSM from publications I used to respect like Financial Times and The Economist. I have now found other sources that are trying to stick to facts like BNE Intelligence (founder is banned from Russia). So no; your attempt at “free world soap opera versus Russian propaganda” misses the spot again.
Your ammo passages is just pure cope, I’m sorry.
Riddle me this buddy, what goes harder 1 super precise Patriot missile worth USD 4M or 100 Geran drones worth USD 40K a pop? Do you want to bring out your GDP per capita chart again? Or perhaps the “russians are stealing porcelain toilets and dishwashers to build Iskander missiles” cope I’ve read in so many “respectable” and “free” western outlets? Are we really going over this again?
This post was edited by Malopox on Jan 22 2025 09:06am