Apathy is worse than hate. Equal, at best.



You quoted me but said nothing. I would like to respond to your criticism, but you haven't provided any. It's easy to assume you have nothing to say, but I'd like to give you a chance to prove me wrong.

Damn poor dogs.

uhhhhhhh hahaha. yeah, no

No what? He said words you disagree with it, therefore basic monetary services (needed to eat, pay the rent, etc.) should be denied?

We don't even allow convicted rapists and murderers to be debanked. Why would we apply such things against political opponents?

You really are a marxist, aren't you? "If you can't outvote your opponent, starve them!"

banks and credit card companies are free to choose who they do business with. would you be mad at a bank refusing to do business with a terrorist? no? okay then shut the hell up

This post was edited by gnarjay on Dec 19 2024 10:23pm

No, the monetary services needed to do business in the nation are not "optional". Denying anyone the use of those services based on anything other than debt is comparable to denying someone electricity or phone service because you don't like something they said.

Banks are a public utility, heavily regulated and NOT intended to be used to target political opponents. The fact that democrats have been actively using the banks to target their political opponents is kind of fun. Dems won't be in power much longer. What would your opinion be if suddenly every progressive freak were debanked come January 20th?

"But muh private company" only seems to apply when marxists seek to harm anyone to the right of Mao. Why is that?

1) you dont know what a marxist is
2)what happened to the racist incel nick fuentes is a feature of capitalism (which is funny consdering you are bootlicking CEO's in the luigi thread)
3)banks are not a public utility currently
4)again, what happened to fuentes is not political. he is an extremist and companies here, in America, are free to tell people to fuck off if they want to

your stance is more marxist than the stance you think youre arguing against lmao

get a grip little boy

1. LOL. Why do marxists always claim that only Marxists know what Marxism is? Such trash.

2. I don't care about Nick Fuentes. What I care about is that the industry (banking) with the HIGHEST amount of regulation and oversight, which acts on government request, is banning people for political speech. You cannot even pay rent for most apartments with cash. You MUST use a bank account or credit card. Which part of this confuses you? That's not a feature of capitalism, that's a feature of banks being controlled by corrupt politicians.

3. Banks ARE a public utility. In fact, they are the most highly regulated public utility on the planet.

4. What happened to Fuentes IS political, because he's only a known entity due to his political speech.

You can lie and you can blame "capitalism", a made up term, made up by none other than Marx, all you want. The fact is that you, a Marxist, believe you have the right to prevent a person from trading their goods and services for other goods and services, by denying them the medium of currency that all landlords and merchants will accept. Which, funny enough in the US, is no longer the USD (cash), but is instead a bank account number or credit/debit card number.

Like I said, your belief is that anyone who says mean words should starve. As long as they're to the right of Mao.

Jan 6 far right was trying to hang your own VP
Can we realize there is nutjob extremist on both sides?

Oh? Is there video of this attempted hanging somewhere? I've seen thousands of videos about January 6th, and most of it was absolutely peaceful and non-violence. Ofc, an unarmed woman was murdered. Some guys who looked suspiciously like Feds pushed barriers aside and punched cops and somehow DIDN'T get arrested or come up on charges. Where's this hanging shit though?