d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Space Travel > What Do You Think
1238Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 13,222
Joined: Jan 2 2011
Gold: 17,400.00
May 2 2015 03:52pm
right now we are limited to our exploration of space and right now nasa/U.S government is privatizing the space industry.They are doing this by issuing out huge contracts to which ever commercial business can develop the best new method of space travel. Right now they are building more durable space crafts with faster engines. However what if that is not the solution. Anyone reading this should know of Time relativity, meaning faster you get to achieving the speed of light time slows down for you or if your near a huge gravitational force depending on gravity consequences are same or worse. from my understanding of wormholes that is a better way of travelling due to the fact that we wont be experiencing time dialation. Anyone who goes on a mission travelling at speed of light or faster will return to earth as an alien almost due to the fact that hundreds of years would of passed. now my question is should we be dumping more money into the funding of creating wormholes or a faster space engine?
Member
Posts: 7,721
Joined: Oct 11 2008
Gold: 304.00
May 2 2015 06:49pm
Honestly don't know where you're trying to get at
We're not anywhere close
Member
Posts: 37,200
Joined: Oct 16 2004
Gold: 0.00
May 3 2015 01:19am
Quote (kalelvszod @ May 2 2015 03:52pm)
right now we are limited to our exploration of space and right now nasa/U.S government is privatizing the space industry.They are doing this by issuing out huge contracts to which ever commercial business can develop the best new method of space travel. Right now they are building more durable space crafts with faster engines. However what if that is not the solution. Anyone reading this should know of Time relativity, meaning faster you get to achieving the speed of light time slows down for you or if your near a huge gravitational force depending on gravity consequences are same or worse. from my understanding of wormholes that is a better way of travelling due to the fact that we wont be experiencing time dialation. Anyone who goes on a mission travelling at speed of light or faster will return to earth as an alien almost due to the fact that hundreds of years would of passed. now my question is should we be dumping more money into the funding of creating wormholes or a faster space engine?


So much is wrong :(
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
May 3 2015 02:11am
Quote (kalelvszod @ May 2 2015 04:52pm)
Anyone who goes on a mission travelling at speed of light or faster will return to earth as an alien


mfw

Quote (kalelvszod @ May 2 2015 04:52pm)
now my question is should we be dumping more money into the funding of creating wormholes or a faster space engine?


optimally neither... space travel would be a huge waste of money right now

This post was edited by Voyaging on May 3 2015 02:13am
Member
Posts: 13,222
Joined: Jan 2 2011
Gold: 17,400.00
May 3 2015 06:34am
Quote (Voyaging @ May 3 2015 04:11am)
mfw



optimally neither... space travel would be a huge waste of money right now


its something we been trying to achieve for a long time now. we kinda trashed this planet and it wouldnt help to have a back up plan incase this planet ever does become uninhabitable. i would say in the next 50-100 years we will see big changes in this field i do not think that future is as distant as we think. remember in 1950 going to space was sci fi now 65 years later we are planning a mission to mars, sci fi is becoming reality in sense so imagine where we will be in another 65 years..if we dont blow ourselves up first.

Quote (Belarathon @ May 3 2015 03:19am)
So much is wrong :(


i was a lil buzzed last night when i wrote it so i apologize if its all over the place lol. im not sure what you mean by wrong? time dialation is experienced when near intense gravity. interstellar travel at the speed of light if not greater would slow time down for us but remain the same for people on earth. now to me thats not the best option . theories of folding space and going from one point to another in an instant seems better. im sure if we had unlimited sustainable power we would be experimenting with that now, we just cant generate the power required.
Member
Posts: 37,200
Joined: Oct 16 2004
Gold: 0.00
May 3 2015 08:58am
Quote (kalelvszod @ May 3 2015 06:34am)
its something we been trying to achieve for a long time now. we kinda trashed this planet and it wouldnt help to have a back up plan incase this planet ever does become uninhabitable. i would say in the next 50-100 years we will see big changes in this field i do not think that future is as distant as we think. remember in 1950 going to space was sci fi now 65 years later we are planning a mission to mars, sci fi is becoming reality in sense so imagine where we will be in another 65 years..if we dont blow ourselves up first.



i was a lil buzzed last night when i wrote it so i apologize if its all over the place lol. im not sure what you mean by wrong? time dialation is experienced when near intense gravity. interstellar travel at the speed of light if not greater would slow time down for us but remain the same for people on earth. now to me thats not the best option . theories of folding space and going from one point to another in an instant seems better. im sure if we had unlimited sustainable power we would be experimenting with that now, we just cant generate the power required.


First I'll say that if we had unlimited sustainable power, there would be no need to go anywhere at all :) (btw this is not possible - look up the second law of thermodynamics)

Second, one can not travel "at the speed of light or faster". It's not a matter of just figuring out how to do it with new technologies... It is a fundamental rule written into the fabric of the cosmos - it can not be done (at least not by anything with any amount of mass). Now travelling close to C (if it were possible for humans - that we don't know, and we certainly aren't close), could potentially be a legitimate form of interstellar space travel. I'm sure anyone going out on a space mission near the speed of light would be going on a one-way, colonization mission... no need to worry about returning to earth as an ancient relic.

Third, we are not going to create our own wormholes (let alone create them and keep them open for travel). There is not enough energy on earth, and it is not possible to create a device that provides unlimited energy/outputs more energy than it takes in (again it's not a matter of needing new technology - this is entropy, the second law of thermodynamics; one law that physicists believe will never be broken). In any case, it wouldn't be possible to predict where you would come out on the other end, or even if going back in the other end would bring you back to the same original spot.

Lastly, please stop spelling time dilation "time dialation"... it hurts the eyes.

Hope that clears up my last brief post.
Member
Posts: 13,222
Joined: Jan 2 2011
Gold: 17,400.00
May 3 2015 01:33pm
Quote (Belarathon @ May 3 2015 10:58am)
First I'll say that if we had unlimited sustainable power, there would be no need to go anywhere at all :) (btw this is not possible - look up the second law of thermodynamics)

Second, one can not travel "at the speed of light or faster". It's not a matter of just figuring out how to do it with new technologies... It is a fundamental rule written into the fabric of the cosmos - it can not be done (at least not by anything with any amount of mass). Now travelling close to C (if it were possible for humans - that we don't know, and we certainly aren't close), could potentially be a legitimate form of interstellar space travel. I'm sure anyone going out on a space mission near the speed of light would be going on a one-way, colonization mission... no need to worry about returning to earth as an ancient relic.

Third, we are not going to create our own wormholes (let alone create them and keep them open for travel). There is not enough energy on earth, and it is not possible to create a device that provides unlimited energy/outputs more energy than it takes in (again it's not a matter of needing new technology - this is entropy, the second law of thermodynamics; one law that physicists believe will never be broken). In any case, it wouldn't be possible to predict where you would come out on the other end, or even if going back in the other end would bring you back to the same original spot.

Lastly, please stop spelling time dilation "time dialation"... it hurts the eyes.

Hope that clears up my last brief post.


im aware of that theory "As an object approaches the speed of light, its mass rises precipitously. If an object tries to travel 186,000 miles per second, its mass becomes infinite, and so does the energy required to move it. For this reason, no normal object can travel as fast or faster than the speed of light." if what your saying is true then we will never be able to colonize new planets or reach new systems because its technically impossible. i always thought folding space our creating wormholes would be our next bet. im sure there is some way around the laws of physics that we just havent discovered yet. be pretty shitty if we have this drive for exploration in our blood but limited to just 1 solar system. looks like i spelled DIALTION correct in my previous post sorry if i mispelled it before lol. i agree for most part that space travel would be one way but thats why im having this discussion. what if there are alternatives we just havent realized or considered yet. you go back to the early 1900's and tell people about what the world would be like today, they would laugh and say your dreaming.whenever there is a will there is a way otherwise we wouldnt of advanced this far.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 3 2015 05:11pm
We have no reason to assume humans could ever travel through wormholes, much less survive even if that was figured out. The solution is just that any space exploration the people who go would have to accept they aren't going to return to their families.
Member
Posts: 37,200
Joined: Oct 16 2004
Gold: 0.00
May 3 2015 11:50pm
Quote (kalelvszod @ May 3 2015 01:33pm)
im aware of that theory "As an object approaches the speed of light, its mass rises precipitously. If an object tries to travel 186,000 miles per second, its mass becomes infinite, and so does the energy required to move it. For this reason, no normal object can travel as fast or faster than the speed of light." if what your saying is true then we will never be able to colonize new planets or reach new systems because its technically impossible. i always thought folding space our creating wormholes would be our next bet. im sure there is some way around the laws of physics that we just havent discovered yet. be pretty shitty if we have this drive for exploration in our blood but limited to just 1 solar system. looks like i spelled DIALTION correct in my previous post sorry if i mispelled it before lol. i agree for most part that space travel would be one way but thats why im having this discussion. what if there are alternatives we just havent realized or considered yet. you go back to the early 1900's and tell people about what the world would be like today, they would laugh and say your dreaming.whenever there is a will there is a way otherwise we wouldnt of advanced this far.


Ahhh!! Please stop with the "dialation"!!! Eye cancer

And even though what I posted last is true, it does not mean that we can never discover new systems. Not at all. There is no physical law stating that we cannot travel 90%, 95%, or even 99.99+% the speed of light - more than fast enough to make long-term missions out into the cosmos. The ship would have to be huge - large enough to sustain a population similar to that of a small town. Entire generations would be born, live, and die on this ship before it reached its final destination. It's an interesting thought.
But yes, just because we can't travel faster than C does not mean that exploring other star systems is a complete impossibility... not sure how you got that idea!!
Member
Posts: 19,727
Joined: Nov 19 2011
Gold: 286.01
May 12 2015 10:45am
I read somewhere that they "teleported" some atoms by exploding it and there was like a copy appearing somewhere.

could this be done with more complex things like humans ?

Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
1238Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll