d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Star Appears To Be Older Than Universe
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Aug 10 2013 07:32pm
"Scientists have discovered an "impossible" star which appears to be older than the universe.

The mysterious star Methuselah appears to be between 14 and 15 billion years old - a bit of an issue considering the universe itself is known to have come into existence 13.8 billion years ago."

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/hd140283.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/03/08/astronomers-find-ancient-star-methuselah_n_2834999.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

This post was edited by HeLiCaL on Aug 10 2013 07:32pm
Member
Posts: 35,926
Joined: Apr 17 2010
Gold: 80.16
Aug 10 2013 09:04pm
aliens
Member
Posts: 5,048
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 738.20
Aug 10 2013 09:51pm
I read that Methuselah was once thought to be 16 billion years old, but after refining the distance it was decreased to 14.5 billion years old. Also, scientists still aren't 100% positive of its age. From what I understand, they can still refine the distance even more which will likely put its age under the calculated universe's age.

Quote
The star could be as old as 14.5 billion years (plus or minus 0.8 billion years), which at first glance would make it older than the universe's calculated age of about 13.8 billion years, an obvious dilemma.


Quote
Once the true distance is known, an exact value for the star's intrinsic brightness can be calculated. Knowing a star's intrinsic brightness is a fundamental prerequisite to estimating its age.


From the NASA.gov website

This post was edited by Diablo2Guides on Aug 10 2013 09:53pm
Member
Posts: 17,045
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 5,957.78
Aug 10 2013 10:56pm
the text is wrong.....now it is 70billion years old, and only slowed down enough for stars last 16.7billion... the big bang is now the big slow down lol but 70 billion years ago a bang
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Aug 10 2013 11:24pm
Quote (doomchaser @ Aug 10 2013 11:56pm)
the text is wrong.....now it is 70billion years old, and only slowed down enough for stars last 16.7billion... the big bang is now the big slow down lol but 70 billion years ago a bang


is english your first language?

do you think your own typing looks fine?
Member
Posts: 17,045
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 5,957.78
Aug 10 2013 11:43pm
Quote (Subwoofer @ Aug 10 2013 10:24pm)
is english your first language?

do you think your own typing looks fine?


My grammer is very poor. do you say, you can't understand that i said, the big bang was 70billion years ago? and stars only formed 16.7billion years ago..
Member
Posts: 10,812
Joined: Oct 15 2009
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Aug 10 2013 11:55pm
Quote (doomchaser @ Aug 10 2013 10:43pm)
My grammer is very poor. do you say, you can't understand that i said, the big bang was 70billion years ago? and stars only formed 16.7billion years ago..


i can't make heads or tails of what your saying
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Aug 11 2013 12:10am
Quote (doomchaser @ Aug 10 2013 09:43pm)
My grammer is very poor. do you say, you can't understand that i said, the big bang was 70billion years ago? and stars only formed 16.7billion years ago..


Credibility?
Member
Posts: 17,045
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 5,957.78
Aug 11 2013 12:20am
Quote (majorblood @ Aug 10 2013 11:10pm)
Credibility?


Sure it was NASA show or something i seen it on through the wormhole maybe. Credit Michio Kaku and his colleagues.

High

This post was edited by doomchaser on Aug 11 2013 12:23am
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Aug 11 2013 12:22am
Quote (doomchaser @ Aug 10 2013 10:20pm)
Sure it was NASA show or something i seen it on through the wormhole maybe. Credit Michio Kaku and his colleagues.


Credibility?
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll