I will, in my own words, propose a theory to help answer some of the bigger problems in science yet to be solved:

-What was the cause of Big bang (partly explained), and how could this universe emerge from "nothing" (explained).
-How can there be an imbalance of baryonic matter and antibaryonic matter in the observable universe (baryon asymmetry), when our current laws of nature suggests that the universe be neutral with all conserved charges? (explained)


All it took to create our universe was a high amount of energy causing a reaction known as the big bang in our universe.
The observable universe is made up of much more baryonic matter than antibaryonic matter.
While on one hand you had the big bang, simultaneously another big bang in another universe occurred (coexisting with ours, but not in the same dimension), which is comprised of an equal amount of antibaryonic matter as our universe.
It would be more correct to say that the networth of baryonic to antibaryonic matter in our universe, equals the networth of antibaryonic to baryonic matter in universe "v. 2.0".

This can be simplified to the reaction:
energy -> baryonic matter + anti baryonic matter
This is the reverse of what you get when matter comes in contact with anti matter, which creates energy according to e=mc^2

Where this can happen once, it is probably happening in other scenarios, but not necessarily in the same way.
While our current universe suggests that there has to have been born a twin universe (or several others, where the sum of all are neutral with conserved charges),
other such universes might be created as just one standalone universe without baryon asymmetry.

The dimension, for lack of a better word, from hence the energy creating our big bang originated, should by all logic not be following the same rules existing in our universe.
For example time and space may not exist there, in the same way it does here, or other natural laws might apply, which if learned, could make us oversee the question of "when and how did it all originate?".
That question might just bother us for all time, if all we look to are the physical laws created in our own universe.

Because baryon number is not a conserved quantity.

the important thing about a theory is it needs to be testable

"
A total Balance of Positive and Negative energy may provide Zero Energy (i.e. the ability to do no work) but this is not "Nothing". it is in fact everything.

The general consensus is that antimatter should have positive mass, so I'm not sure what you are referring to here.
I were under the impression that negative energy and negative mass are purely hypothetical, and not proven to exist like antimatter.

Gravitational potential energy is "negative". Of course it's a matter of convention what we call negative and positive, but it has the opposite sign (which is what really matters).

This post was edited by Azrad on Jul 21 2013 06:38pm

Before the universe formed, there wasn't gravity at all, it didn't exist yet. In fact the four fundamental forces are Gravity, Strong nuclear, Weak Nuclear, and Electromagnetism. They were, like everything else concentrated in a region (still unknown where that was).

As for the second universe, I highly doubt that there is one. I have yet to be proven wrong :).

there is zero universes and this is all a dream of god's...or we live in a multi universe....from what I understand of things we know. there is our two choices
nothing else will work mathematically...either 0 or multi verse...no one wants too believe we live in a simulation, soo most go with string theory

This post was edited by doomchaser on Jul 22 2013 09:05am

what are your qualifications in the fields of mathematics and cosmology?

If I'am wrong please tell me..