d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Immovable Object Vs. Unstoppable Force > Solved
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 721
Joined: Oct 25 2011
Gold: 4.00
Jan 25 2013 02:29pm
There we go :thumbsup:

Member
Posts: 10,680
Joined: Oct 26 2011
Gold: 11.01
Jan 25 2013 02:51pm
0/10

Just reported that video for scam/misleading on youtube.
If you are trying to learn and watch this video you will become dumber.
Member
Posts: 6,759
Joined: Jul 8 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jan 25 2013 03:21pm
Quote (omghacks2 @ Jan 25 2013 02:51pm)
0/10

Just reported that video for scam/misleading on youtube.
If you are trying to learn and watch this video you will become dumber.


how?
Member
Posts: 10,680
Joined: Oct 26 2011
Gold: 11.01
Jan 25 2013 03:43pm
Quote (Derkaderk @ Jan 25 2013 09:21pm)
how?


1- He says: "immovable objects cannot be" because of the law of relativity.

The main point is: THE OBJECT IS IMMOVABLE
Period.

Dont try to go around and change the question, just so you can answer it in different way.

Said that, he goes and develops the rest of the thinking which is wrong from the first second.

Even salesman use this technic, ilusionists, politicians, etc..
To say something so that you assume it to be truth, and from there he makes his point valid.

2- He then proceeds to say: ".. doesnt mean the object is not moving"

HOW THE HELL THE OBJECT IS NOT MOVING IF THE QUESTION SAYS: "IMMOVABLE OBJECT" ??

See you would shot him right on sight face to face.. the rest of his arguments are based on this, theyre all wrong.

3- Says: "light is an unstoppable force" <- dumbest thing Ive heard
Light is eat for breakfast by blackholes
Light is bent by gravity
Light can be reflected back and changed direction

4- His conclusion doesnt make ANY sense to any of what he just said in the rest of the video.
His answer didnt come from all that thinking, its a random answer without a bit of logic behind it to support it.

"oh the they would just not touch each other" LOL .. fkin troll

...


Its like asking you: "Hey derek do you know what lies beyond the universe?"
Which you would answer: "Yea, theres a big field of sunflowers"

Terrible video I swear. All that guy wants is to cause some fuss and get views and subs to get paid.

This post was edited by omghacks2 on Jan 25 2013 03:45pm
Member
Posts: 6,759
Joined: Jul 8 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jan 25 2013 04:23pm
Quote (omghacks2 @ Jan 25 2013 03:43pm)
1- He says: "immovable objects cannot be" because of the law of relativity.

The main point is: THE OBJECT IS IMMOVABLE
Period.

Dont try to go around and change the question, just so you can answer it in different way.


Said that, he goes and develops the rest of the thinking which is wrong from the first second.

Even salesman use this technic, ilusionists, politicians, etc..
To say something so that you assume it to be truth, and from there he makes his point valid.

2- He then proceeds to say: ".. doesnt mean the object is not moving"

HOW THE HELL THE OBJECT IS NOT MOVING IF THE QUESTION SAYS: "IMMOVABLE OBJECT" ??

See you would shot him right on sight face to face.. the rest of his arguments are based on this, theyre all wrong.

3- Says: "light is an unstoppable force" <- dumbest thing Ive heard
Light is eat for breakfast by blackholes
Light is bent by gravity
Light can be reflected back and changed direction


4- His conclusion doesnt make ANY sense to any of what he just said in the rest of the video.
His answer didnt come from all that thinking, its a random answer without a bit of logic behind it to support it.

"oh the they would just not touch each other" LOL .. fkin troll

...


Its like asking you: "Hey derek do you know what lies beyond the universe?"
Which you would answer: "Yea, theres a big field of sunflowers"


Terrible video I swear. All that guy wants is to cause some fuss and get views and subs to get paid.


lol he's dismissing arbitrary hypotheticals because what's the point of attempting to reason out a logical system involving things that don't exist? how can you apply our universal logic to something that doesn't exist? you can't. Regardless, he interprets the question and offers his own explanation.

Immovable objects are not moving..yes I don't know why you're exclaiming about this statement.

Light's trajectory is changed by gravity because of gravity's influence on space not on photons. Haven't you heard of the speed of light? There's a reason it's a constant and not a variable rate.

I think his conclusion may be silly, but the entire question is silly, and there's still useful information in the video regardless. It's more educational than anything I've ever seen you post.

Yes, it is, that's why he explains that people's naming scheme for the situation is impossible. I'm glad you understand.

This post was edited by Derkaderk on Jan 25 2013 04:25pm
Member
Posts: 1,358
Joined: Dec 30 2012
Gold: 0.10
Jan 27 2013 12:45pm
Didn't watch.
Member
Posts: 9,065
Joined: Dec 4 2007
Gold: 49.00
Jan 29 2013 11:35pm
This thread looks to smart for me
Member
Posts: 36,389
Joined: Jul 18 2008
Gold: 3,192.00
Jan 30 2013 06:22am
I say it's simple really. The unstoppable force simply changes direction because of Newton's 3rd law of motion.
Member
Posts: 6,759
Joined: Jul 8 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jan 30 2013 11:50am
Quote (Mastersam93 @ Jan 30 2013 06:22am)
I say it's simple really.  The unstoppable force simply changes direction because of Newton's 3rd law of motion.


wouldn't the unstoppable force have infinite momentum?
Member
Posts: 2,664
Joined: Dec 4 2011
Gold: 6.66
Jan 30 2013 11:59am
Quote (Derkaderk @ Jan 30 2013 07:50pm)
wouldn't the unstoppable force have infinite momentum?


how would the rate of change of momentum have infinite momentum?
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll